Opinion piece: non-traditional practical work for traditional campuses

Timothy D. Drysdale, Simon Kelley, Anne Marie Scott, Victoria Dishon, Andrew Weightman, Richard James Lewis, Stephen Watts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Traditional practical work for higher education in STEM subjects is under pressure from rising student numbers and adesired increase in active learning. Investing in more buildings and staff is financially challenging, while stretching existing resources affects outcomes, health, and participation. A more pragmatic approach is to embrace a less instrumentalist view of practical work in physical spaces and instead adopt a critical post-humanist approach which mixes both humanity and technology to achieve a sum greater than the parts, not bound by the limits of either. We share the experiences of leading UK exponents of non-traditional laboratories in the four main categories of simulation, virtual laboratories, real-asynchronous, and real-synchronous activities, as well as experts in scaling digital education initiatives for university-wide adoption. We foreshadow opportunities, challenges and potential solutions to increasing the opportunity for active learning by students studying at traditional campuses, via the complementary addition of non-traditional practical work.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-222
Number of pages13
JournalHigher Education Pedagogies
Volume5
Issue number1
Early online date14 Sep 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • automation
  • blended learning
  • experiments
  • Laboratories
  • pooling
  • practical work
  • remote laboratories
  • simulations
  • virtual laboratories

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Drysdale, T. D., Kelley, S., Scott, A. M., Dishon, V., Weightman, A., Lewis, R. J., & Watts, S. (2020). Opinion piece: non-traditional practical work for traditional campuses. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816845