Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Open Science for Qualitative Research

Crystal N. Steltenpohl, Brinna Mawhinney, Veli-Matti Karhulahti, Annayah M. B. Prosser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Open scholarship practices-often also referred to as open research or open science-are increasingly seen as relevant to the research lifecycle. What open scholarship looks like in practice will inevitably vary by field, methodology, epistemology, access to resources, and other considerations. In this article, we outline a few important considerations for researchers who use qualitative research methods in deciding which open scholarship practices are most applicable for their own work and suggest a few practices that may be of interest, namely data sharing, preregistration, negative case analysis, audit trails and member checking. Engagement or disengagement of any given practice should be guided by demands of research epistemology, context, community, topicn and methodology. Finally, we suggest a few places for researchers to start if they wish to learn more about open scholarship more broadly and engage with critical conversations around these practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-419
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume30
Issue number6
Early online date11 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.

Funding

Karhulahti is funded/cofunded by the European Union (ERC, ORE, 101042052).

FundersFunder number
European Commission
European Research Council
ORE101042052

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Health Services Research
  • Methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Open Science for Qualitative Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this