Abstract
Open scholarship practices-often also referred to as open research or open science-are increasingly seen as relevant to the research lifecycle. What open scholarship looks like in practice will inevitably vary by field, methodology, epistemology, access to resources, and other considerations. In this article, we outline a few important considerations for researchers who use qualitative research methods in deciding which open scholarship practices are most applicable for their own work and suggest a few practices that may be of interest, namely data sharing, preregistration, negative case analysis, audit trails and member checking. Engagement or disengagement of any given practice should be guided by demands of research epistemology, context, community, topicn and methodology. Finally, we suggest a few places for researchers to start if they wish to learn more about open scholarship more broadly and engage with critical conversations around these practices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 413-419 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 11 Jul 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2025 |
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.Funding
Karhulahti is funded/cofunded by the European Union (ERC, ORE, 101042052).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| European Commission | |
| European Research Council | |
| ORE | 101042052 |
Keywords
- Ethics
- Health Services Research
- Methods
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Open Science for Qualitative Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS

