Abstract
This article looks at the use of Web 2.0 in Italian language teaching and its potential to provide creative teaching routes through the Internet and the digital world and additional strategies to motivate students. It details the effectiveness of some applications and game-based learning platforms as tools for reinforcing learning experiences, informed by the pedagogical approach of “doing with the language”, that strategically engage students with oriented oral and written tasks. The premise of this approach is that digital educational tools are particularly suitable for students who are digitally native. In a university context, language learning normally takes place during a few contact hours of formal teaching in class. It is, therefore, important to constantly motivate our learners to explore the language also outside the classroom. The latter may be achieved by giving them the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the possibilities of informal e-learning available on private and social internet spaces. The article presents some practical Web 2.0 scenarios that I have introduced in my courses and gives practical examples of how the students have benefited from them. Initial results show that the web fosters the creation of a virtual environment which is highly productive for personal language learning.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Unpublished - 2015 |
Event | SIS, The Society for Italian Studies, Biennial Conference - Oxford University, UK, Oxford Duration: 28 Sept 2015 → 30 Sept 2015 |
Conference
Conference | SIS, The Society for Italian Studies, Biennial Conference |
---|---|
City | Oxford |
Period | 28/09/15 → 30/09/15 |
Bibliographical note
Berne, E., (1961) Transactional analysis in psychotherapy, Random House, New York.Caon, F., (2008) Educazione linguistica e differenziazione, UTET, Torino.
Davoli, P., (2012) Didattica 2.0: metodogie e tecnologie Web 2.0. Ansas, Competenze per lo sviluppo (FSE): pp. 1-22.
Hemard, D.P., (1997) Design principles and guidelines for authoring hypermedia language learning applications. System, 25 (I), pp. 9 -27. In Gûtl, C., Chang, V. and Edwards, A. and Boruta, S., (2013) Flexible and Affordable Foreign Language Learning Environment based on Web 2.0 Technologies. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 8 (2): pp. 16-28.
Illsley Clark J., Dawson, C., (1998) Growing again: parenting ourselves, parenting our children. Hazelden, Center City, MN.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., (2009) Educating the net-generation: a handbook of findings for practice and policy. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press. In Morgan, L., (2011) Understanding the digital divide: a closer examination of the application of Web 2.0 technologies by Undergraduate students, Vol.17, Number 10. pp. 344-350.
Little, D., (2005) The common European framework and the European language portfolio: involving learners and their judgments in the assessment process. In Morgan, L., (2012) Generation Y, learner autonomy and the potential of Web 2.0 tools for languages learning and teaching, Campus-Wide Information Systems, Vol.29 Iss 3 pp. 166-176.
Pontecorvo, C., (1995) L’apprendimento tra culture e contesti: l’apprendistato congnitivo. In Pontecorvo, C., Ajello, A., Zucchermaglio, C., I contesti sociali dell’apprendimento. Milano: LED.
Prensky, M., (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9.
Torresan, P., (2015) The Transactional Analysis Motivation Model as a Framework of Reference for Teachers and Trainers. In Humanising language teaching. Year 17, issue 3.
Keywords
- independent learning – motivation – creativity – innovation in teaching and learning – multitasking activities