On the creation and destruction of national wealth: Are financial collapses endogenous?

Stanislav E. Shmelev, Robert U. Ayres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This paper traces US national wealth from 1914 through 2015 and constructs a multivariate econometric model that combines elements of short‐term and long‐term dynamics. We find that US wealth depends on a range of macroeconomic variables, including the wealth itself ob-served in the previous period, change in market capitalization, change in US house price index and inflation. Less impactful, statistically significant factors included unemployment, changes in oil price, and change in debt‐to‐GDP ratio. Another significant result is that the Glass–Steagall Act, which prohibited commercial banks from speculative activity in the stock market after 1933, had a statistically significant positive impact on wealth in the US. We test the model by asking whether it could have anticipated the actual collapse in 2008, given prior data up to 2000, 2005 and 2010. All three tests forecasted a sharp wealth decline starting in 2008, followed by a recovery. These results suggest the possibility of forecasting future financial collapses. We have found our model to be slightly more accurate in the short run than in the long run.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7352
JournalSustainability
Volume13
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Dynamics
  • Econometrics
  • Modelling
  • USA
  • Wealth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the creation and destruction of national wealth: Are financial collapses endogenous?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this