TY - JOUR
T1 - On quantile quantile plots for generalized linear models
AU - Augustin, Nicole
AU - Sauleau, Eric-Andre
AU - Wood, Simon
PY - 2012/8
Y1 - 2012/8
N2 - The distributional assumption for a generalized linear model is often checked by plotting the ordered deviance residuals against the quantiles of a standard normal distribution. Such plots can be difficult to interpret, because even when the model is correct, the plot often deviates substantially from a straight line. To rectify this problem Garcia Ben and Yohai (2004, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 13: 36-47) proposed plotting the deviance residuals against their theoretical quantiles, under the assumption that the model is correct. Such plots are closer to a straight line, when the model is correct, making them much more useful for model checking. However the quantile computation proposed in Garcia Ben and Yohai is, in general, relatively complicated to implement and computationally expensive, so that general purpose software for these plots is only available for the Poisson and binary cases in the R package {\tt robust}. As an alternative the theoretical quantiles can efficiently and simply be estimated by repeatedly simulating new response data from the fitted model and computing the corresponding residuals. This method also provides reference bands for judging the significance of departures of QQ-plots from ideal straight line form. A second alternative is to estimate the quantiles using quantiles of the response variable distribution according to the estimated model. This latter alternative generally has lower computational cost than the first, but does not yield QQ-plot reference bands. In simulations the quantiles produced by the new methods give results indistinguishable from the original Garc\'ia Ben and Yohai quantile computations, but the scaling of computational cost with sample size is much improved so that a 500 fold reduction in computation time was observed at sample size 50000. Application of the methods to generalized linear models fitted to prostate cancer incidence data suggest that they are particularly useful in large dataset cases that might otherwise be incorrectly viewed as zero-inflated. The new approaches are simple enough to implement for any exponential family distribution and for several alternative types of residual, and this has been done for all the families available for use with generalized linear models in the basic distribution of R.
AB - The distributional assumption for a generalized linear model is often checked by plotting the ordered deviance residuals against the quantiles of a standard normal distribution. Such plots can be difficult to interpret, because even when the model is correct, the plot often deviates substantially from a straight line. To rectify this problem Garcia Ben and Yohai (2004, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 13: 36-47) proposed plotting the deviance residuals against their theoretical quantiles, under the assumption that the model is correct. Such plots are closer to a straight line, when the model is correct, making them much more useful for model checking. However the quantile computation proposed in Garcia Ben and Yohai is, in general, relatively complicated to implement and computationally expensive, so that general purpose software for these plots is only available for the Poisson and binary cases in the R package {\tt robust}. As an alternative the theoretical quantiles can efficiently and simply be estimated by repeatedly simulating new response data from the fitted model and computing the corresponding residuals. This method also provides reference bands for judging the significance of departures of QQ-plots from ideal straight line form. A second alternative is to estimate the quantiles using quantiles of the response variable distribution according to the estimated model. This latter alternative generally has lower computational cost than the first, but does not yield QQ-plot reference bands. In simulations the quantiles produced by the new methods give results indistinguishable from the original Garc\'ia Ben and Yohai quantile computations, but the scaling of computational cost with sample size is much improved so that a 500 fold reduction in computation time was observed at sample size 50000. Application of the methods to generalized linear models fitted to prostate cancer incidence data suggest that they are particularly useful in large dataset cases that might otherwise be incorrectly viewed as zero-inflated. The new approaches are simple enough to implement for any exponential family distribution and for several alternative types of residual, and this has been done for all the families available for use with generalized linear models in the basic distribution of R.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859107033&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.026
U2 - 10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.026
DO - 10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.026
M3 - Article
VL - 56
SP - 2404
EP - 2409
JO - Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
JF - Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
IS - 8
ER -