Octane response in a downsized, highly boosted direct injection spark ignition engine

S. M. Remmert, R. F. Cracknell, R. Head, A. Schuetze, Andrew Lewis, S. Akehurst, James Turner, A. Popplewell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 17 Citations

Abstract

Increasingly strict government emissions regulations in combination with consumer demand for high performance vehicles is driving gasoline engine development towards highly downsized, boosted direct injection technologies. In these engines, fuel consumption is improved by reducing pumping, friction and heat losses, yet performance is maintained by operating at higher brake mean effective pressure. However, the in-cylinder conditions of these engines continue to diverge from traditional naturally aspirated technologies, and especially from the Cooperative Fuels Research engine used to define the octane rating scales. Engine concepts are thus key platforms with which to screen the influence of fundamental fuel properties on future engine performance.

‘ULTRABOOST’, a collaborative research project which is co-funded by the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), the UK's innovation agency, is a downsized, highly boosted, 2.0L in-line 4 cylinder prototype engine, designed to achieve 35% CO2 emissions reduction without compromising the performance of a 5.0L V8 naturally aspirated production engine. To probe engine response to fuel, a matrix of 14 formulations was tested at several engine conditions. This is the first in a series of fuel related papers and focuses on the engine's response to the research octane number (RON). The knock limited spark advance was determined for a series of fuels with RON varying from 95 to 112; octane was shown to provide 5 or 10° crank angle advance in knock limited spark advance at 2000 and 3000 rpm, respectively. This study demonstrates that fuel octane quality continues to be important for the performance of emerging downsized engine technologies. Furthermore, the trend for continued engine downsizing will increase the potential performance benefit associated with knock resistant fuels.
LanguageEnglish
Article number2014-01-1397
Pages131-143
Number of pages13
JournalSAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Apr 2014
EventSAE World Congress 2014 - Detroit, USA United States
Duration: 8 Apr 201410 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Direct injection
Internal combustion engines
Engines
Antiknock rating
Engine cylinders
Electric sparks
Combustion knock
Vehicle performance
Heat losses
Brakes
Fuel consumption
Gasoline
Innovation
Friction

Cite this

Remmert, S. M., Cracknell, R. F., Head, R., Schuetze, A., Lewis, A., Akehurst, S., ... Popplewell, A. (2014). Octane response in a downsized, highly boosted direct injection spark ignition engine. DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-1397

Octane response in a downsized, highly boosted direct injection spark ignition engine. / Remmert, S. M.; Cracknell, R. F.; Head, R.; Schuetze, A.; Lewis, Andrew; Akehurst, S.; Turner, James; Popplewell, A.

In: SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants , Vol. 7, No. 1, 2014-01-1397, 01.04.2014, p. 131-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a61d8017c2514499b07f880036652e6d,
title = "Octane response in a downsized, highly boosted direct injection spark ignition engine",
abstract = "Increasingly strict government emissions regulations in combination with consumer demand for high performance vehicles is driving gasoline engine development towards highly downsized, boosted direct injection technologies. In these engines, fuel consumption is improved by reducing pumping, friction and heat losses, yet performance is maintained by operating at higher brake mean effective pressure. However, the in-cylinder conditions of these engines continue to diverge from traditional naturally aspirated technologies, and especially from the Cooperative Fuels Research engine used to define the octane rating scales. Engine concepts are thus key platforms with which to screen the influence of fundamental fuel properties on future engine performance.‘ULTRABOOST’, a collaborative research project which is co-funded by the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), the UK's innovation agency, is a downsized, highly boosted, 2.0L in-line 4 cylinder prototype engine, designed to achieve 35{\%} CO2 emissions reduction without compromising the performance of a 5.0L V8 naturally aspirated production engine. To probe engine response to fuel, a matrix of 14 formulations was tested at several engine conditions. This is the first in a series of fuel related papers and focuses on the engine's response to the research octane number (RON). The knock limited spark advance was determined for a series of fuels with RON varying from 95 to 112; octane was shown to provide 5 or 10° crank angle advance in knock limited spark advance at 2000 and 3000 rpm, respectively. This study demonstrates that fuel octane quality continues to be important for the performance of emerging downsized engine technologies. Furthermore, the trend for continued engine downsizing will increase the potential performance benefit associated with knock resistant fuels.",
author = "Remmert, {S. M.} and Cracknell, {R. F.} and R. Head and A. Schuetze and Andrew Lewis and S. Akehurst and James Turner and A. Popplewell",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4271/2014-01-1397",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "131--143",
journal = "SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants",
issn = "1946-3952",
publisher = "SAE International",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Octane response in a downsized, highly boosted direct injection spark ignition engine

AU - Remmert,S. M.

AU - Cracknell,R. F.

AU - Head,R.

AU - Schuetze,A.

AU - Lewis,Andrew

AU - Akehurst,S.

AU - Turner,James

AU - Popplewell,A.

PY - 2014/4/1

Y1 - 2014/4/1

N2 - Increasingly strict government emissions regulations in combination with consumer demand for high performance vehicles is driving gasoline engine development towards highly downsized, boosted direct injection technologies. In these engines, fuel consumption is improved by reducing pumping, friction and heat losses, yet performance is maintained by operating at higher brake mean effective pressure. However, the in-cylinder conditions of these engines continue to diverge from traditional naturally aspirated technologies, and especially from the Cooperative Fuels Research engine used to define the octane rating scales. Engine concepts are thus key platforms with which to screen the influence of fundamental fuel properties on future engine performance.‘ULTRABOOST’, a collaborative research project which is co-funded by the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), the UK's innovation agency, is a downsized, highly boosted, 2.0L in-line 4 cylinder prototype engine, designed to achieve 35% CO2 emissions reduction without compromising the performance of a 5.0L V8 naturally aspirated production engine. To probe engine response to fuel, a matrix of 14 formulations was tested at several engine conditions. This is the first in a series of fuel related papers and focuses on the engine's response to the research octane number (RON). The knock limited spark advance was determined for a series of fuels with RON varying from 95 to 112; octane was shown to provide 5 or 10° crank angle advance in knock limited spark advance at 2000 and 3000 rpm, respectively. This study demonstrates that fuel octane quality continues to be important for the performance of emerging downsized engine technologies. Furthermore, the trend for continued engine downsizing will increase the potential performance benefit associated with knock resistant fuels.

AB - Increasingly strict government emissions regulations in combination with consumer demand for high performance vehicles is driving gasoline engine development towards highly downsized, boosted direct injection technologies. In these engines, fuel consumption is improved by reducing pumping, friction and heat losses, yet performance is maintained by operating at higher brake mean effective pressure. However, the in-cylinder conditions of these engines continue to diverge from traditional naturally aspirated technologies, and especially from the Cooperative Fuels Research engine used to define the octane rating scales. Engine concepts are thus key platforms with which to screen the influence of fundamental fuel properties on future engine performance.‘ULTRABOOST’, a collaborative research project which is co-funded by the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), the UK's innovation agency, is a downsized, highly boosted, 2.0L in-line 4 cylinder prototype engine, designed to achieve 35% CO2 emissions reduction without compromising the performance of a 5.0L V8 naturally aspirated production engine. To probe engine response to fuel, a matrix of 14 formulations was tested at several engine conditions. This is the first in a series of fuel related papers and focuses on the engine's response to the research octane number (RON). The knock limited spark advance was determined for a series of fuels with RON varying from 95 to 112; octane was shown to provide 5 or 10° crank angle advance in knock limited spark advance at 2000 and 3000 rpm, respectively. This study demonstrates that fuel octane quality continues to be important for the performance of emerging downsized engine technologies. Furthermore, the trend for continued engine downsizing will increase the potential performance benefit associated with knock resistant fuels.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1397

U2 - 10.4271/2014-01-1397

DO - 10.4271/2014-01-1397

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 131

EP - 143

JO - SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants

T2 - SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants

JF - SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants

SN - 1946-3952

IS - 1

M1 - 2014-01-1397

ER -