Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault

Olivia Smith, Tina Skinner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 19 Citations

Abstract

Despite years of policy reform in England and Wales, court responses to rape and sexual assault victims remain inadequate. Existing literature often relies on interviews, is outdated by policy, or ignores underlying assumptions. This study therefore observed rape and sexual assault trials, identifying underlying assumptions using critical discourse analysis (CDA). The main themes that arose were routine delays, notions of “rational” behavior, extreme interpretations of “beyond reasonable doubt” (BRD) and “burden of proof,” and winning as priority. These highlight the need to move beyond prioritizing shorter term change and begin addressing the fundamental inadequacies of court responses to rape and sexual assault victims.
LanguageEnglish
Pages298-326
JournalFeminist Criminology
Volume7
Issue number4
Early online date12 Apr 2012
DOIs
StatusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

assault
rape
reform policy
discourse analysis
interpretation
interview

Cite this

Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault. / Smith, Olivia; Skinner, Tina.

In: Feminist Criminology, Vol. 7, No. 4, 10.2012, p. 298-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd6bc16c64a7478685ce5990fd279e25,
title = "Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault",
abstract = "Despite years of policy reform in England and Wales, court responses to rape and sexual assault victims remain inadequate. Existing literature often relies on interviews, is outdated by policy, or ignores underlying assumptions. This study therefore observed rape and sexual assault trials, identifying underlying assumptions using critical discourse analysis (CDA). The main themes that arose were routine delays, notions of “rational” behavior, extreme interpretations of “beyond reasonable doubt” (BRD) and “burden of proof,” and winning as priority. These highlight the need to move beyond prioritizing shorter term change and begin addressing the fundamental inadequacies of court responses to rape and sexual assault victims.",
author = "Olivia Smith and Tina Skinner",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1177/1557085112437875",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "298--326",
journal = "Feminist Criminology",
issn = "1557-0851",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observing court responses to victims of rape and sexual assault

AU - Smith,Olivia

AU - Skinner,Tina

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Despite years of policy reform in England and Wales, court responses to rape and sexual assault victims remain inadequate. Existing literature often relies on interviews, is outdated by policy, or ignores underlying assumptions. This study therefore observed rape and sexual assault trials, identifying underlying assumptions using critical discourse analysis (CDA). The main themes that arose were routine delays, notions of “rational” behavior, extreme interpretations of “beyond reasonable doubt” (BRD) and “burden of proof,” and winning as priority. These highlight the need to move beyond prioritizing shorter term change and begin addressing the fundamental inadequacies of court responses to rape and sexual assault victims.

AB - Despite years of policy reform in England and Wales, court responses to rape and sexual assault victims remain inadequate. Existing literature often relies on interviews, is outdated by policy, or ignores underlying assumptions. This study therefore observed rape and sexual assault trials, identifying underlying assumptions using critical discourse analysis (CDA). The main themes that arose were routine delays, notions of “rational” behavior, extreme interpretations of “beyond reasonable doubt” (BRD) and “burden of proof,” and winning as priority. These highlight the need to move beyond prioritizing shorter term change and begin addressing the fundamental inadequacies of court responses to rape and sexual assault victims.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865735438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1557085112437875

U2 - 10.1177/1557085112437875

DO - 10.1177/1557085112437875

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 298

EP - 326

JO - Feminist Criminology

T2 - Feminist Criminology

JF - Feminist Criminology

SN - 1557-0851

IS - 4

ER -