Obesity, neoliberalism and epidemic psychology

critical commentary and alternative approaches to public health

Lee F. Monaghan, Andrea E. Bombak, Emma Rich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Obesity and neoliberalism are two concepts that generate plenty of concern and debate, arguably leading to more heat than light when terms like ‘epidemic’ are thrown into the fray. Drawing from critical weight studies, this paper offers critical commentary on the recent designation of obesity as a ‘neoliberal epidemic’ that can be attributed to energy-dense foods and a toxic mode of political economic organization. After delineating neoliberalism and the use of this concept in health studies, discussion turns towards contrasting invocations in the ‘fat field’ before seeking to navigate a course through this terrain. In addition to contributing to critical weight studies and the obesity debate, this commentary engages discussions on the perils of invoking neoliberalism in public health critique. In conclusion, we move from critique to hope with reference to epistemologies derived from alternative health practices, notably frameworks incorporating Indigenous knowledge(s).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalCritical Public Health
Early online date5 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Public Health
Obesity
Psychology
Weights and Measures
Poisons
Health
Fats
Economics
Food

Keywords

  • critique
  • epidemic
  • fatness
  • hope
  • neoliberalism
  • Obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Obesity, neoliberalism and epidemic psychology : critical commentary and alternative approaches to public health. / Monaghan, Lee F.; Bombak, Andrea E.; Rich, Emma.

In: Critical Public Health, 05.09.2017, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fb15aecf48914a0a8012811e09312c3c,
title = "Obesity, neoliberalism and epidemic psychology: critical commentary and alternative approaches to public health",
abstract = "Obesity and neoliberalism are two concepts that generate plenty of concern and debate, arguably leading to more heat than light when terms like ‘epidemic’ are thrown into the fray. Drawing from critical weight studies, this paper offers critical commentary on the recent designation of obesity as a ‘neoliberal epidemic’ that can be attributed to energy-dense foods and a toxic mode of political economic organization. After delineating neoliberalism and the use of this concept in health studies, discussion turns towards contrasting invocations in the ‘fat field’ before seeking to navigate a course through this terrain. In addition to contributing to critical weight studies and the obesity debate, this commentary engages discussions on the perils of invoking neoliberalism in public health critique. In conclusion, we move from critique to hope with reference to epistemologies derived from alternative health practices, notably frameworks incorporating Indigenous knowledge(s).",
keywords = "critique, epidemic, fatness, hope, neoliberalism, Obesity",
author = "Monaghan, {Lee F.} and Bombak, {Andrea E.} and Emma Rich",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/09581596.2017.1371278",
language = "English",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Critical Public Health",
issn = "0958-1596",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obesity, neoliberalism and epidemic psychology

T2 - critical commentary and alternative approaches to public health

AU - Monaghan, Lee F.

AU - Bombak, Andrea E.

AU - Rich, Emma

PY - 2017/9/5

Y1 - 2017/9/5

N2 - Obesity and neoliberalism are two concepts that generate plenty of concern and debate, arguably leading to more heat than light when terms like ‘epidemic’ are thrown into the fray. Drawing from critical weight studies, this paper offers critical commentary on the recent designation of obesity as a ‘neoliberal epidemic’ that can be attributed to energy-dense foods and a toxic mode of political economic organization. After delineating neoliberalism and the use of this concept in health studies, discussion turns towards contrasting invocations in the ‘fat field’ before seeking to navigate a course through this terrain. In addition to contributing to critical weight studies and the obesity debate, this commentary engages discussions on the perils of invoking neoliberalism in public health critique. In conclusion, we move from critique to hope with reference to epistemologies derived from alternative health practices, notably frameworks incorporating Indigenous knowledge(s).

AB - Obesity and neoliberalism are two concepts that generate plenty of concern and debate, arguably leading to more heat than light when terms like ‘epidemic’ are thrown into the fray. Drawing from critical weight studies, this paper offers critical commentary on the recent designation of obesity as a ‘neoliberal epidemic’ that can be attributed to energy-dense foods and a toxic mode of political economic organization. After delineating neoliberalism and the use of this concept in health studies, discussion turns towards contrasting invocations in the ‘fat field’ before seeking to navigate a course through this terrain. In addition to contributing to critical weight studies and the obesity debate, this commentary engages discussions on the perils of invoking neoliberalism in public health critique. In conclusion, we move from critique to hope with reference to epistemologies derived from alternative health practices, notably frameworks incorporating Indigenous knowledge(s).

KW - critique

KW - epidemic

KW - fatness

KW - hope

KW - neoliberalism

KW - Obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029430632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1371278

U2 - 10.1080/09581596.2017.1371278

DO - 10.1080/09581596.2017.1371278

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Critical Public Health

JF - Critical Public Health

SN - 0958-1596

ER -