Numerical simulations of water waves generated by subaerial granular and solid-block landslides: Validation, comparison, and predictive equations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (SciVal)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We compare waves generated by subaerial solid-block and granular landslides and propose equations for predicting their maximum initial wave amplitudes. The recent Anak Krakatau subaerial landslide tsunami in December 2018, which resulted in more than 450 deaths, demonstrated the knowledge gap on this subject and motivated this study. Here, we make numerical models using the numerical package FLOW3D-Hydro for solid-block and granular landslides and validate them using physical experiments. Results indicate that the maximum initial wave amplitudes generated by solid-block landslides are 107% larger than those generated by granular landslides in our experiments. The relationship between maximum initial wave amplitude and slope angle is inverse for solid-block slides whereas, it is direct for granular slides. However, a critical angle of 60° is achieved for granular slides, and for slope angles more than this critical value, the maximum wave amplitudes start to decrease. Regarding wave period, our results show that it remains nearly unchanged for both types of landslides as water depth and slide volume vary. The period generated by solid-block slides increases as the slope angle decreases; however, it remains unchanged for granular slides. The predictive equations are applied to real landslide tsunamis and resulted in satisfactory performances.
Original languageEnglish
Article number112853
JournalOcean Engineering
Volume266
Issue numberPart 3
Early online date31 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study is funded by the Royal Society (the United Kingdom) grant number CHL\R1\180173, Lloyd's Tercentenary Research Foundation , the Lighthill Risk Network, and the Lloyd's Register Foundation. The license for using the software FLOW3D- Hydro was granted by Flow Science Inc. to Brunel University London . We are sincerely grateful to Mark Keating (Flow sciences Inc.) for his assistance regarding the software license. We are grateful to HR Wallingford (UK) ( https://www.hrwallingford.com/ ) for providing the wave gauges used in this research. The article benefited from constructive review comments from two anonymous reviewers.

Funding Information:
This study is funded by the Royal Society (the United Kingdom) grant number CHL\R1\180173, Lloyd's Tercentenary Research Foundation, the Lighthill Risk Network, and the Lloyd's Register Foundation. The license for using the software FLOW3D-Hydro was granted by Flow Science Inc. to Brunel University London. We are sincerely grateful to Mark Keating (Flow sciences Inc.) for his assistance regarding the software license. We are grateful to HR Wallingford (UK) (https://www.hrwallingford.com/) for providing the wave gauges used in this research. The article benefited from constructive review comments from two anonymous reviewers.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Landslide
  • Numerical simulation
  • Physical modelling
  • Spectral analysis
  • Tsunami

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Ocean Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Numerical simulations of water waves generated by subaerial granular and solid-block landslides: Validation, comparison, and predictive equations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this