Narratives of illness and offending: mentally disordered offenders’ views on their offending

Jeremy Dixon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (SciVal)
103 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Narratives have been used in both the sociology of health and illness and in criminology to examine how groups of people present themselves in moral terms. This article focuses on the narratives of offenders with mental health problems in England subject to section 37/41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to examine how they justified offending prior to admission. Participants presented illness in a variety of different ways indicating a range of moral positions towards offending. In line with previous research a first group used mental illness to excuse offending and saw themselves as achieving moral reform through treatment. A second group also used illness to excuse offending, but did so inconsistently, seeking to mitigate responsibility whilst distancing themselves from treatment obligations. A third group portrayed themselves as dishonourable both due to their category of offence and the type of illness experienced. A final group rejected both labels of illness and offending, seeking to portray themselves as consistently moral.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1053-1068
Number of pages16
JournalSociology of Health and Illness
Volume40
Issue number6
Early online date18 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • crime
  • forensic psychiatry
  • health beliefs
  • mental health and illness
  • narrative method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Narratives of illness and offending: mentally disordered offenders’ views on their offending'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this