"Mundane Sights" of Power: A History of Social Monitoring and its Subversion in Rwanda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
140 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

By tracing the Rwandan state’s “mundane sights”—everyday forms of presence
and monitoring—the article sheds light on the historical development and
striking continuities in “interactive surveillance” across a century of turbulent political change. It considers three emblematic surveillance technologies—the institution of nyumbakumi, the identity card, and umuganda works (and public activities more broadly)—which, despite their implication in genocide, were retained, reworked, and even bolstered after the conflict ended. The article investigates what drives the observed continuity and “layering” of social monitoring over time, highlighting the key role played by ambiguity and ambivalence in this process. The research expands the concept of political surveillance, moving away from the unidirectional notion of “forms of watching,” and questions any easy distinctions between visibility and invisibility in the exercise of power or its subversion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-86
JournalAfrican Studies Review
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Rwanda
subversion
surveillance
monitoring
continuity
history
genocide
historical development
political change
ambivalence

Cite this

"Mundane Sights" of Power: A History of Social Monitoring and its Subversion in Rwanda. / Purdekova, Andrea.

In: African Studies Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2016, p. 59-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e545c3bbd7549c6a472e84b0fad1675,
title = "{"}Mundane Sights{"} of Power: A History of Social Monitoring and its Subversion in Rwanda",
abstract = "By tracing the Rwandan state’s “mundane sights”—everyday forms of presenceand monitoring—the article sheds light on the historical development andstriking continuities in “interactive surveillance” across a century of turbulent political change. It considers three emblematic surveillance technologies—the institution of nyumbakumi, the identity card, and umuganda works (and public activities more broadly)—which, despite their implication in genocide, were retained, reworked, and even bolstered after the conflict ended. The article investigates what drives the observed continuity and “layering” of social monitoring over time, highlighting the key role played by ambiguity and ambivalence in this process. The research expands the concept of political surveillance, moving away from the unidirectional notion of “forms of watching,” and questions any easy distinctions between visibility and invisibility in the exercise of power or its subversion.",
author = "Andrea Purdekova",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1017/asr.2016.32",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "59--86",
journal = "African Studies Review",
issn = "0002-0206",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Mundane Sights" of Power: A History of Social Monitoring and its Subversion in Rwanda

AU - Purdekova, Andrea

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - By tracing the Rwandan state’s “mundane sights”—everyday forms of presenceand monitoring—the article sheds light on the historical development andstriking continuities in “interactive surveillance” across a century of turbulent political change. It considers three emblematic surveillance technologies—the institution of nyumbakumi, the identity card, and umuganda works (and public activities more broadly)—which, despite their implication in genocide, were retained, reworked, and even bolstered after the conflict ended. The article investigates what drives the observed continuity and “layering” of social monitoring over time, highlighting the key role played by ambiguity and ambivalence in this process. The research expands the concept of political surveillance, moving away from the unidirectional notion of “forms of watching,” and questions any easy distinctions between visibility and invisibility in the exercise of power or its subversion.

AB - By tracing the Rwandan state’s “mundane sights”—everyday forms of presenceand monitoring—the article sheds light on the historical development andstriking continuities in “interactive surveillance” across a century of turbulent political change. It considers three emblematic surveillance technologies—the institution of nyumbakumi, the identity card, and umuganda works (and public activities more broadly)—which, despite their implication in genocide, were retained, reworked, and even bolstered after the conflict ended. The article investigates what drives the observed continuity and “layering” of social monitoring over time, highlighting the key role played by ambiguity and ambivalence in this process. The research expands the concept of political surveillance, moving away from the unidirectional notion of “forms of watching,” and questions any easy distinctions between visibility and invisibility in the exercise of power or its subversion.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2016.32

U2 - 10.1017/asr.2016.32

DO - 10.1017/asr.2016.32

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 59

EP - 86

JO - African Studies Review

JF - African Studies Review

SN - 0002-0206

IS - 2

ER -