Multinational corporation codes of conduct

governance tools for corporate social responsibility?

Krista Bondy, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research Issue: We investigate the assumption found in code and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature that suggests codes are primarily associated with the CSR practices of an organization.
Research Findings/Results: A web-based study of 150 corporations from three different countries indicates there is little empirical support for this link between codes and CSR. Thus, if a corporation has a code, it is more likely used to govern traditional business concerns, such as compliance with third party governance requirements, internal issues such as conflict of interest, bribery and corruption, insider trading, etc. This is consistent across all three countries. Therefore we must be cautious against assuming a link between codes and CSR. Evidence of the different governance contexts is also briefly discussed.
Theoretical Implications: Findings are addressed to theoretical debates about the construction of corporate identity, the amoralization of business, and the globalization of management practices.
Practical Implications: Stakeholders must be careful in assuming that the presence of a code indicates CSR commitments or behavior. Stakeholders need to look at the content of the code to confirm or deny this assumption, particularly such stakeholders as investors who tend to use the existence of a code as evidence of CSR practices to tick “check the box.”
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)294-311
Number of pages18
JournalCorporate Governance: An International Review
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Industry
Codes of conduct
Multinational corporations
Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility
Stakeholders
Compliance

Cite this

Multinational corporation codes of conduct : governance tools for corporate social responsibility? / Bondy, Krista; Matten, Dirk; Moon, Jeremy.

In: Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 07.2008, p. 294-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{656d038c9ab84238b217c2e93ec25706,
title = "Multinational corporation codes of conduct: governance tools for corporate social responsibility?",
abstract = "Research Issue: We investigate the assumption found in code and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature that suggests codes are primarily associated with the CSR practices of an organization. Research Findings/Results: A web-based study of 150 corporations from three different countries indicates there is little empirical support for this link between codes and CSR. Thus, if a corporation has a code, it is more likely used to govern traditional business concerns, such as compliance with third party governance requirements, internal issues such as conflict of interest, bribery and corruption, insider trading, etc. This is consistent across all three countries. Therefore we must be cautious against assuming a link between codes and CSR. Evidence of the different governance contexts is also briefly discussed. Theoretical Implications: Findings are addressed to theoretical debates about the construction of corporate identity, the amoralization of business, and the globalization of management practices. Practical Implications: Stakeholders must be careful in assuming that the presence of a code indicates CSR commitments or behavior. Stakeholders need to look at the content of the code to confirm or deny this assumption, particularly such stakeholders as investors who tend to use the existence of a code as evidence of CSR practices to tick “check the box.”",
author = "Krista Bondy and Dirk Matten and Jeremy Moon",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00694.x",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "294--311",
journal = "Corporate Governance: An International Review",
issn = "0964-8410",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multinational corporation codes of conduct

T2 - governance tools for corporate social responsibility?

AU - Bondy, Krista

AU - Matten, Dirk

AU - Moon, Jeremy

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Research Issue: We investigate the assumption found in code and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature that suggests codes are primarily associated with the CSR practices of an organization. Research Findings/Results: A web-based study of 150 corporations from three different countries indicates there is little empirical support for this link between codes and CSR. Thus, if a corporation has a code, it is more likely used to govern traditional business concerns, such as compliance with third party governance requirements, internal issues such as conflict of interest, bribery and corruption, insider trading, etc. This is consistent across all three countries. Therefore we must be cautious against assuming a link between codes and CSR. Evidence of the different governance contexts is also briefly discussed. Theoretical Implications: Findings are addressed to theoretical debates about the construction of corporate identity, the amoralization of business, and the globalization of management practices. Practical Implications: Stakeholders must be careful in assuming that the presence of a code indicates CSR commitments or behavior. Stakeholders need to look at the content of the code to confirm or deny this assumption, particularly such stakeholders as investors who tend to use the existence of a code as evidence of CSR practices to tick “check the box.”

AB - Research Issue: We investigate the assumption found in code and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature that suggests codes are primarily associated with the CSR practices of an organization. Research Findings/Results: A web-based study of 150 corporations from three different countries indicates there is little empirical support for this link between codes and CSR. Thus, if a corporation has a code, it is more likely used to govern traditional business concerns, such as compliance with third party governance requirements, internal issues such as conflict of interest, bribery and corruption, insider trading, etc. This is consistent across all three countries. Therefore we must be cautious against assuming a link between codes and CSR. Evidence of the different governance contexts is also briefly discussed. Theoretical Implications: Findings are addressed to theoretical debates about the construction of corporate identity, the amoralization of business, and the globalization of management practices. Practical Implications: Stakeholders must be careful in assuming that the presence of a code indicates CSR commitments or behavior. Stakeholders need to look at the content of the code to confirm or deny this assumption, particularly such stakeholders as investors who tend to use the existence of a code as evidence of CSR practices to tick “check the box.”

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54749097127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00694.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00694.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00694.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 294

EP - 311

JO - Corporate Governance: An International Review

JF - Corporate Governance: An International Review

SN - 0964-8410

IS - 4

ER -