Muiltisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline

evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task

Nicholas P. Holmes, Daniel Sanabria, Gemma A. Calvert, Charles Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Crossing the hands over, whether across the body midline or with respect to each other, leads to measurable changes in spatial compatibility, spatial attention, and frequently to a general decrement in discrimination performance for tactile stimuli. The majority of multisensory crossed hands effects, however, have been demonstrated with explicit or implicit spatial discrimination tasks, raising the question of whether non-spatial discrimination tasks also show spatial effects when the hands are crossed. We designed a novel, non-spatial tactile discrimination task to address this issue. Participants made speeded discriminations of single- versus double-pulse vibrotactile targets, while trying to ignore simultaneous visual distractor stimuli, in both hands uncrossed and hands crossed postures. Tactile discrimination performance was significantly affected by the visual distractors (demonstrating a significant crossmodal congruency effect) and was affected most by visual distractors in the same external location as the tactile target (i.e., spatial modulation), regardless of the posture (uncrossed or crossed) of the hands (i.e., spatial 'remapping' of visual-tactile interactions). Finally, crossing the hands led to a general performance decrement with visual distractors, but not in a control task with unimodal visual or tactile judgements. These results demonstrate, for the first time, significant spatial and postural modulations of crossmodal congruency effects in a non-spatial discrimination task.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)108-115
Number of pages8
JournalBrain Research
Volume1077
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Touch
Hand
Posture
Discrimination (Psychology)

Cite this

Muiltisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline : evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task. / Holmes, Nicholas P.; Sanabria, Daniel; Calvert, Gemma A.; Spence, Charles.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 1077, No. 1, 10.03.2006, p. 108-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holmes, Nicholas P. ; Sanabria, Daniel ; Calvert, Gemma A. ; Spence, Charles. / Muiltisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline : evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task. In: Brain Research. 2006 ; Vol. 1077, No. 1. pp. 108-115.
@article{8201e1d1ba5a4a5f82584ea7c859ede0,
title = "Muiltisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task",
abstract = "Crossing the hands over, whether across the body midline or with respect to each other, leads to measurable changes in spatial compatibility, spatial attention, and frequently to a general decrement in discrimination performance for tactile stimuli. The majority of multisensory crossed hands effects, however, have been demonstrated with explicit or implicit spatial discrimination tasks, raising the question of whether non-spatial discrimination tasks also show spatial effects when the hands are crossed. We designed a novel, non-spatial tactile discrimination task to address this issue. Participants made speeded discriminations of single- versus double-pulse vibrotactile targets, while trying to ignore simultaneous visual distractor stimuli, in both hands uncrossed and hands crossed postures. Tactile discrimination performance was significantly affected by the visual distractors (demonstrating a significant crossmodal congruency effect) and was affected most by visual distractors in the same external location as the tactile target (i.e., spatial modulation), regardless of the posture (uncrossed or crossed) of the hands (i.e., spatial 'remapping' of visual-tactile interactions). Finally, crossing the hands led to a general performance decrement with visual distractors, but not in a control task with unimodal visual or tactile judgements. These results demonstrate, for the first time, significant spatial and postural modulations of crossmodal congruency effects in a non-spatial discrimination task.",
author = "Holmes, {Nicholas P.} and Daniel Sanabria and Calvert, {Gemma A.} and Charles Spence",
note = "ID number: ISI:000236659000013",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.010",
language = "English",
volume = "1077",
pages = "108--115",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muiltisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline

T2 - evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task

AU - Holmes, Nicholas P.

AU - Sanabria, Daniel

AU - Calvert, Gemma A.

AU - Spence, Charles

N1 - ID number: ISI:000236659000013

PY - 2006/3/10

Y1 - 2006/3/10

N2 - Crossing the hands over, whether across the body midline or with respect to each other, leads to measurable changes in spatial compatibility, spatial attention, and frequently to a general decrement in discrimination performance for tactile stimuli. The majority of multisensory crossed hands effects, however, have been demonstrated with explicit or implicit spatial discrimination tasks, raising the question of whether non-spatial discrimination tasks also show spatial effects when the hands are crossed. We designed a novel, non-spatial tactile discrimination task to address this issue. Participants made speeded discriminations of single- versus double-pulse vibrotactile targets, while trying to ignore simultaneous visual distractor stimuli, in both hands uncrossed and hands crossed postures. Tactile discrimination performance was significantly affected by the visual distractors (demonstrating a significant crossmodal congruency effect) and was affected most by visual distractors in the same external location as the tactile target (i.e., spatial modulation), regardless of the posture (uncrossed or crossed) of the hands (i.e., spatial 'remapping' of visual-tactile interactions). Finally, crossing the hands led to a general performance decrement with visual distractors, but not in a control task with unimodal visual or tactile judgements. These results demonstrate, for the first time, significant spatial and postural modulations of crossmodal congruency effects in a non-spatial discrimination task.

AB - Crossing the hands over, whether across the body midline or with respect to each other, leads to measurable changes in spatial compatibility, spatial attention, and frequently to a general decrement in discrimination performance for tactile stimuli. The majority of multisensory crossed hands effects, however, have been demonstrated with explicit or implicit spatial discrimination tasks, raising the question of whether non-spatial discrimination tasks also show spatial effects when the hands are crossed. We designed a novel, non-spatial tactile discrimination task to address this issue. Participants made speeded discriminations of single- versus double-pulse vibrotactile targets, while trying to ignore simultaneous visual distractor stimuli, in both hands uncrossed and hands crossed postures. Tactile discrimination performance was significantly affected by the visual distractors (demonstrating a significant crossmodal congruency effect) and was affected most by visual distractors in the same external location as the tactile target (i.e., spatial modulation), regardless of the posture (uncrossed or crossed) of the hands (i.e., spatial 'remapping' of visual-tactile interactions). Finally, crossing the hands led to a general performance decrement with visual distractors, but not in a control task with unimodal visual or tactile judgements. These results demonstrate, for the first time, significant spatial and postural modulations of crossmodal congruency effects in a non-spatial discrimination task.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.010

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.010

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.010

M3 - Article

VL - 1077

SP - 108

EP - 115

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 1

ER -