Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abstract

This review compares the mould susceptibility of bio-based and conventional insulation. Mould growth poses a risk to building durability and occupant health, with bio-based materials being more susceptible due to their organic composition. However, testing practices limit meaningful comparisons, and laboratory studies often fail to replicate real-world conditions. Recommendations include standardised testing, in-situ monitoring and field studies, and development of antifungal strategies to understand and address mould risk across insulation options.
Original languageEnglish
Article number29
Journalnpj Materials Degradation
Volume10
Issue number1
Early online date16 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Feb 2026

Data Availability Statement

Data are provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

Funding

Dr. A. Shea and Dr. V. Cascione gratefully acknowledge funding support from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Innovation Action programme under grant number https://www.inbuilt-project.eu. We also wish to acknowledge partners from the INBUILT project, specifically, Fred Robinson and Annie Ferrari of Mykor Ltd., for their help and advice in the development of Mycelium Bio-Composite materials and test methods.

FundersFunder number
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
INBUILT

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ceramics and Composites
    • Chemistry (miscellaneous)
    • Materials Science (miscellaneous)
    • Materials Chemistry

    Cite this