Abstract
This review compares the mould susceptibility of bio-based and conventional insulation. Mould growth poses a risk to building durability and occupant health, with bio-based materials being more susceptible due to their organic composition. However, testing practices limit meaningful comparisons, and laboratory studies often fail to replicate real-world conditions. Recommendations include standardised testing, in-situ monitoring and field studies, and development of antifungal strategies to understand and address mould risk across insulation options.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 29 |
| Journal | npj Materials Degradation |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 16 Feb 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 16 Feb 2026 |
Data Availability Statement
Data are provided within the manuscript or supplementary information files.Funding
Dr. A. Shea and Dr. V. Cascione gratefully acknowledge funding support from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Innovation Action programme under grant number https://www.inbuilt-project.eu. We also wish to acknowledge partners from the INBUILT project, specifically, Fred Robinson and Annie Ferrari of Mykor Ltd., for their help and advice in the development of Mycelium Bio-Composite materials and test methods.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme | |
| INBUILT |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ceramics and Composites
- Chemistry (miscellaneous)
- Materials Science (miscellaneous)
- Materials Chemistry
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS