Morality and the consequences of marketing action

John Desmond, Andrew Crane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores issues of morality in relation to the consequences of marketing action. It addresses the reasons why, despite adverse social consequences, as well as the exhortations of marketing ethicists, a societal-based morality continues to languish at the margins of marketing practice. We note that ethicists mistakenly characterize organizations as being 'amoral' and their decisions as being 'purely economic'. This ignores the reality that marketing theory and practice are suffused with the morality of economic self-interest. This has important implications for whether one can understand the consequences of marketing action as intended or unintended. We suggest it is due to the power of egoism that attempts to import ethical maxims from moral philosophy have been sidelined. Finally, we discuss the difficulties of securing a more moral basis for marketing decision-making.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1222-1230
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume57
Issue number11
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Nov 2004

Keywords

  • Consequences
  • Marketing
  • Morality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Cite this

Morality and the consequences of marketing action. / Desmond, John; Crane, Andrew.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, No. 11, 01.11.2004, p. 1222-1230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desmond, John ; Crane, Andrew. / Morality and the consequences of marketing action. In: Journal of Business Research. 2004 ; Vol. 57, No. 11. pp. 1222-1230.
@article{c0bef388596c4937920bdbb3d4e87001,
title = "Morality and the consequences of marketing action",
abstract = "This paper explores issues of morality in relation to the consequences of marketing action. It addresses the reasons why, despite adverse social consequences, as well as the exhortations of marketing ethicists, a societal-based morality continues to languish at the margins of marketing practice. We note that ethicists mistakenly characterize organizations as being 'amoral' and their decisions as being 'purely economic'. This ignores the reality that marketing theory and practice are suffused with the morality of economic self-interest. This has important implications for whether one can understand the consequences of marketing action as intended or unintended. We suggest it is due to the power of egoism that attempts to import ethical maxims from moral philosophy have been sidelined. Finally, we discuss the difficulties of securing a more moral basis for marketing decision-making.",
keywords = "Consequences, Marketing, Morality",
author = "John Desmond and Andrew Crane",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00452-6",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1222--1230",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Morality and the consequences of marketing action

AU - Desmond, John

AU - Crane, Andrew

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - This paper explores issues of morality in relation to the consequences of marketing action. It addresses the reasons why, despite adverse social consequences, as well as the exhortations of marketing ethicists, a societal-based morality continues to languish at the margins of marketing practice. We note that ethicists mistakenly characterize organizations as being 'amoral' and their decisions as being 'purely economic'. This ignores the reality that marketing theory and practice are suffused with the morality of economic self-interest. This has important implications for whether one can understand the consequences of marketing action as intended or unintended. We suggest it is due to the power of egoism that attempts to import ethical maxims from moral philosophy have been sidelined. Finally, we discuss the difficulties of securing a more moral basis for marketing decision-making.

AB - This paper explores issues of morality in relation to the consequences of marketing action. It addresses the reasons why, despite adverse social consequences, as well as the exhortations of marketing ethicists, a societal-based morality continues to languish at the margins of marketing practice. We note that ethicists mistakenly characterize organizations as being 'amoral' and their decisions as being 'purely economic'. This ignores the reality that marketing theory and practice are suffused with the morality of economic self-interest. This has important implications for whether one can understand the consequences of marketing action as intended or unintended. We suggest it is due to the power of egoism that attempts to import ethical maxims from moral philosophy have been sidelined. Finally, we discuss the difficulties of securing a more moral basis for marketing decision-making.

KW - Consequences

KW - Marketing

KW - Morality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4744338782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00452-6

DO - 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00452-6

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 1222

EP - 1230

JO - Journal of Business Research

T2 - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 11

ER -