Monitoring a Meat-Free Pledge with Smartphones: An Experimental Study

Jared Piazza, Rebecca Gregson, Anastasia Kordoni, Tamara Pfeiler, Matthew Ruby, David Ellis, Ensu Sahin, Maren Reith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (SciVal)
87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Pledges are a popular strategy to encourage meat reduction, though experimental studies of their efficacy are lacking. Three-hundred and twenty-five participants from three different countries (UK, Germany, Australia) were randomly assigned to pledge 28 days meat-free or not, and their behavior was tracked via smartphones. Participants answered daily surveys regarding their eating behavior, meat cravings, and shared photos of their meals. Baseline data was collected prior to the pledge, after the 28 days, and one-month post-intervention. Participants assigned to the pledge condition ate less meat across the 28 days, compared to control participants. Meat reductions, observed at outtake, did not endure one-month post-intervention. Overall, German participants ate the least amount of meat, and showed the sharpest decrease in consumption when pledging. Meat cravings tended to increase among pledgers, relative to control participants. Pledgers who reported high starting intentions and conflict about meat tended to eat less meat and reported fewer cravings. All participants reported reduced meat-eating justifications one-month post-intervention. These findings provide experimental evidence that pledges can encourage meat consumers to reduce their intake, though additional mechanisms are needed to sustain commitments.
Original languageEnglish
Article number105726
JournalAppetite
Volume168
Early online date1 Oct 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

German pledgers exhibited the most sizable reductions in meat consumption during the 28 days, compared to UK and Australian pledgers. This moderating effect of country is likely partly explained by the fact that the German sample had a larger proportion of semi-vegetarians than the other sites, but might also reflect genuine difference in meat reduction at the national level. Germany is a global leader in the production and consumption of meat alternatives (Bielinska et al., 2020; Mensink et al., 2016; Ruby, 2012), and meat abstention is particularly popular among German young adults (Saari et al., 2021), which comprised the bulk of our German sample. While it is true that reduction trends are also occurring in the UK and Australia (e.g., The Vegan Society, 2021), German participants were likely better positioned both in terms of the consumer environment supporting their efforts to reduce and their capacity to do so. Indeed, at intake, our German pledgers reported greater intent and capacity to follow through on their pledge, relative to UK and Australian pledgers.This work was supported by a grant to Jared Piazza, David Ellis, Tamara Pfeiler, and Matthew Ruby, from Animal Charity Evaluators’ Animal Advocacy Research Fund.

FundersFunder number
Vegan Society

    Keywords

    • Conflicted omnivores
    • Experience sampling
    • Meat reduction
    • Pledging
    • Smartphones

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Psychology
    • Nutrition and Dietetics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring a Meat-Free Pledge with Smartphones: An Experimental Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this