Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems

Steve Cayzer, Julie Sullivan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Artificial Immune Systems are engineering systems which have been inspired from the functioning of the biological immune system. We present an immune system model which incorporates two biologically motivated mechanisms to protect against autoimmune reactions, or false positives. The first, anergy, has been subject to the intense focus of immunologists as a possible key to autoimmune disease. The second is danger theory, which has attracted much interest as a possible alternative to traditional self-nonself selection models.We adopt a published immunological model, validate and extend it. Using the same calculations and assumptions as the original model, we integrate danger theory into the software.Without anergy, both models - the original and the danger model - produce similar results. When anergy is added, both models' performance improves. However, there seems to be some synergy between the mechanisms; anergy has a greater effect on the danger model than the original model. These findings should be of interest both to AIS practitioners and to the immunological community.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
Pages26-32
Number of pages7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Event9th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2007 - London, UK United Kingdom
Duration: 7 Jul 200711 Jul 2007

Conference

Conference9th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2007
CountryUK United Kingdom
CityLondon
Period7/07/0711/07/07

Fingerprint

immune system
modeling
software
engineering

Keywords

  • AIS
  • Anergy
  • Danger
  • Danger theory
  • Immune
  • Modelling

Cite this

Cayzer, S., & Sullivan, J. (2007). Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems. In Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 26-32) https://doi.org/10.1145/1276958.1276963

Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems. / Cayzer, Steve; Sullivan, Julie.

Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. 2007. p. 26-32.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Cayzer, S & Sullivan, J 2007, Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems. in Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. pp. 26-32, 9th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2007, London, UK United Kingdom, 7/07/07. https://doi.org/10.1145/1276958.1276963
Cayzer S, Sullivan J. Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems. In Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. 2007. p. 26-32 https://doi.org/10.1145/1276958.1276963
Cayzer, Steve ; Sullivan, Julie. / Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems. Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. 2007. pp. 26-32
@inproceedings{62d27d0cf2bf4f53bad4f279ae75accf,
title = "Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems",
abstract = "Artificial Immune Systems are engineering systems which have been inspired from the functioning of the biological immune system. We present an immune system model which incorporates two biologically motivated mechanisms to protect against autoimmune reactions, or false positives. The first, anergy, has been subject to the intense focus of immunologists as a possible key to autoimmune disease. The second is danger theory, which has attracted much interest as a possible alternative to traditional self-nonself selection models.We adopt a published immunological model, validate and extend it. Using the same calculations and assumptions as the original model, we integrate danger theory into the software.Without anergy, both models - the original and the danger model - produce similar results. When anergy is added, both models' performance improves. However, there seems to be some synergy between the mechanisms; anergy has a greater effect on the danger model than the original model. These findings should be of interest both to AIS practitioners and to the immunological community.",
keywords = "AIS, Anergy, Danger, Danger theory, Immune, Modelling",
author = "Steve Cayzer and Julie Sullivan",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1145/1276958.1276963",
language = "English",
isbn = "1595936971",
pages = "26--32",
booktitle = "Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Modelling danger and anergy in artificial immune systems

AU - Cayzer, Steve

AU - Sullivan, Julie

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Artificial Immune Systems are engineering systems which have been inspired from the functioning of the biological immune system. We present an immune system model which incorporates two biologically motivated mechanisms to protect against autoimmune reactions, or false positives. The first, anergy, has been subject to the intense focus of immunologists as a possible key to autoimmune disease. The second is danger theory, which has attracted much interest as a possible alternative to traditional self-nonself selection models.We adopt a published immunological model, validate and extend it. Using the same calculations and assumptions as the original model, we integrate danger theory into the software.Without anergy, both models - the original and the danger model - produce similar results. When anergy is added, both models' performance improves. However, there seems to be some synergy between the mechanisms; anergy has a greater effect on the danger model than the original model. These findings should be of interest both to AIS practitioners and to the immunological community.

AB - Artificial Immune Systems are engineering systems which have been inspired from the functioning of the biological immune system. We present an immune system model which incorporates two biologically motivated mechanisms to protect against autoimmune reactions, or false positives. The first, anergy, has been subject to the intense focus of immunologists as a possible key to autoimmune disease. The second is danger theory, which has attracted much interest as a possible alternative to traditional self-nonself selection models.We adopt a published immunological model, validate and extend it. Using the same calculations and assumptions as the original model, we integrate danger theory into the software.Without anergy, both models - the original and the danger model - produce similar results. When anergy is added, both models' performance improves. However, there seems to be some synergy between the mechanisms; anergy has a greater effect on the danger model than the original model. These findings should be of interest both to AIS practitioners and to the immunological community.

KW - AIS

KW - Anergy

KW - Danger

KW - Danger theory

KW - Immune

KW - Modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548076939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1276958.1276963

U2 - 10.1145/1276958.1276963

DO - 10.1145/1276958.1276963

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1595936971

SN - 9781595936974

SP - 26

EP - 32

BT - Proceedings of GECCO 2007: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

ER -