TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling the stance leg in two-dimensional analyses of sprinting
T2 - Inclusion of the MTP joint affects joint kinetics
AU - Bezodis, Neil E
AU - Salo, Aki I T
AU - Trewartha, Grant
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Two-dimensional analyses of sprint kinetics are commonly undertaken but often ignore the metatarsalphalangeal (MTP) joint and model the foot as a single segment. Due to the linked-segment nature of inverse dynamics analyses, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ignoring the MTP joint on the calculated joint kinetics at the other stance leg joints during sprinting. High-speed video and force platform data were collected from four to five trials for each of three international athletes. Resultant joint moments, powers, and net work at the stance leg joints during the first stance phase after block clearance were calculated using three different foot models. By ignoring the MTP joint, peak extensor moments at the ankle, knee, and hip were on average 35% higher (p < .05 for each athlete), 40% lower (p < .05), and 9% higher (p > .05), respectively, than those calculated with the MTP joint included. Peak ankle and knee joint powers and net work at all joints were also significantly (p < .05) different. By ignoring a genuine MTP joint plantar flexor moment, artificially high peak ankle joint moments are calculated, and these also affect the calculated joint kinetics at the knee.
AB - Two-dimensional analyses of sprint kinetics are commonly undertaken but often ignore the metatarsalphalangeal (MTP) joint and model the foot as a single segment. Due to the linked-segment nature of inverse dynamics analyses, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ignoring the MTP joint on the calculated joint kinetics at the other stance leg joints during sprinting. High-speed video and force platform data were collected from four to five trials for each of three international athletes. Resultant joint moments, powers, and net work at the stance leg joints during the first stance phase after block clearance were calculated using three different foot models. By ignoring the MTP joint, peak extensor moments at the ankle, knee, and hip were on average 35% higher (p < .05 for each athlete), 40% lower (p < .05), and 9% higher (p > .05), respectively, than those calculated with the MTP joint included. Peak ankle and knee joint powers and net work at all joints were also significantly (p < .05) different. By ignoring a genuine MTP joint plantar flexor moment, artificially high peak ankle joint moments are calculated, and these also affect the calculated joint kinetics at the knee.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862855601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://journals.humankinetics.com.ezp2.bath.ac.uk/jab-back-issues/jab-volume-28-issue-2-may/modeling-the-stance-leg-in-two-dimensional-analyses-of-sprinting-inclusion-of-the-mtp-joint-affects-joint-kinetics
M3 - Article
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 28
SP - 222
EP - 227
JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
IS - 2
ER -