Mixed methods process evaluation of My Breathing Matters, a digital intervention to support self-management of asthma

Kate Greenwell, Ben Ainsworth, Anne Bruton, Elizabeth Murray, Daniel Russell, Mike Thomas, Lucy Yardley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aimed to explore user engagement with ‘My Breathing Matters’, a digital self-management intervention for asthma, and identify factors that may influence engagement. In a mixed methods design, adults with asthma allocated to the intervention arm of a feasibility trial (n = 44) participated in semi-structured interviews (n = 18) and a satisfaction questionnaire (n = 36) to explore their views and experiences of the intervention. Usage data highlighted that key intervention content was delivered to most users. The majority of questionnaire respondents (78%; n = 28) reported they would recommend the intervention to friends and family. Interviewees expressed positive views of the intervention and experienced several benefits, mainly improved asthma control, medication use, and breathing technique. Factors that may influence user engagement were identified, including perceptions of asthma control, current self-management practices, and appeal of the target behaviours and behaviour change techniques. Findings suggested My Breathing Matters was acceptable and engaging to participants, and it was used as intended
Original languageEnglish
Article number35
Journalnpj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date4 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Jun 2021

Cite this