Misconceptions about psychological science

A review

S. Hughes, F. Lyddy, S. Lambe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the available evidence on psychological misconceptions, including key findings, current directions and emerging issues for investigation. We begin by defining misconceptions and then examine their prevalence and persistence, discuss their implications for student learning and highlight potential strategies to eliminate or reduce their influence. Thereafter, several theoretical and methodological issues that have traditionally defined research in this area are discussed. In particular, we highlight the possibility that reported rates of misconceptions may in part be driven by particular features of the measurement procedures employed. On the basis of this analysis, potential avenues for future research are outlined.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-31
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology Learning and Teaching
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

measurement procedure
persistence
science
learning
evidence
student

Cite this

Misconceptions about psychological science : A review. / Hughes, S.; Lyddy, F.; Lambe, S.

In: Psychology Learning and Teaching, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2013, p. 20-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hughes, S. ; Lyddy, F. ; Lambe, S. / Misconceptions about psychological science : A review. In: Psychology Learning and Teaching. 2013 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 20-31.
@article{d05ec9cd897f4d749d93e4072e5bf7e7,
title = "Misconceptions about psychological science: A review",
abstract = "This article provides an overview of the available evidence on psychological misconceptions, including key findings, current directions and emerging issues for investigation. We begin by defining misconceptions and then examine their prevalence and persistence, discuss their implications for student learning and highlight potential strategies to eliminate or reduce their influence. Thereafter, several theoretical and methodological issues that have traditionally defined research in this area are discussed. In particular, we highlight the possibility that reported rates of misconceptions may in part be driven by particular features of the measurement procedures employed. On the basis of this analysis, potential avenues for future research are outlined.",
author = "S. Hughes and F. Lyddy and S. Lambe",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "20--31",
journal = "Psychology Learning and Teaching",
issn = "1475-7257",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misconceptions about psychological science

T2 - A review

AU - Hughes, S.

AU - Lyddy, F.

AU - Lambe, S.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article provides an overview of the available evidence on psychological misconceptions, including key findings, current directions and emerging issues for investigation. We begin by defining misconceptions and then examine their prevalence and persistence, discuss their implications for student learning and highlight potential strategies to eliminate or reduce their influence. Thereafter, several theoretical and methodological issues that have traditionally defined research in this area are discussed. In particular, we highlight the possibility that reported rates of misconceptions may in part be driven by particular features of the measurement procedures employed. On the basis of this analysis, potential avenues for future research are outlined.

AB - This article provides an overview of the available evidence on psychological misconceptions, including key findings, current directions and emerging issues for investigation. We begin by defining misconceptions and then examine their prevalence and persistence, discuss their implications for student learning and highlight potential strategies to eliminate or reduce their influence. Thereafter, several theoretical and methodological issues that have traditionally defined research in this area are discussed. In particular, we highlight the possibility that reported rates of misconceptions may in part be driven by particular features of the measurement procedures employed. On the basis of this analysis, potential avenues for future research are outlined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875086886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20

U2 - 10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20

DO - 10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 20

EP - 31

JO - Psychology Learning and Teaching

JF - Psychology Learning and Teaching

SN - 1475-7257

IS - 1

ER -