Militarization, stigma, and resistance

negotiating military reservist identity in the civilian workplace

Paul Higate, Antonia Dawes, Tim Edmunds, K. Neil Jenkings, Rachel Woodward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Set against the backdrop of the British Government’s Future Reserves 2020 (FR2020) programme, this article addresses military reservists’ experiences of how they are perceived by civilian colleagues in the workplace. Drawing on qualitative interviews with reservists, it analyses their understandings of civilian co-workers’ qualified and sometimes reluctant acceptance in light of FR2020’s implicit aim to use reservists to help realign civil–military relationships. While it appears that civilian work colleagues’ social distancing of reservists helps consolidate the wider public’s perceived lack of understanding of the British armed forces, a more critical view sees reservists’ largely unchallenged presence in the workplace as an exemplary, yet subtle instance of militarization. This is because reservists’ simultaneous (physical) inclusion and (social) distancing or stigmatization constitutes, and is constitutive of, their need to pass as civilian. In conclusion, we argue that a key implication of their passing as civilian is to neutralize debate of the legitimacy–or otherwise–of the armed forces as an institution tasked with violence on behalf of the state.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCritical Military Studies
Early online date10 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • civilian perception
  • militarization
  • Military reservists
  • stigma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Law

Cite this

Militarization, stigma, and resistance : negotiating military reservist identity in the civilian workplace. / Higate, Paul; Dawes, Antonia; Edmunds, Tim; Jenkings, K. Neil; Woodward, Rachel.

In: Critical Military Studies, 10.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbde01d05c5d459ebcb53f26b58c1339,
title = "Militarization, stigma, and resistance: negotiating military reservist identity in the civilian workplace",
abstract = "Set against the backdrop of the British Government’s Future Reserves 2020 (FR2020) programme, this article addresses military reservists’ experiences of how they are perceived by civilian colleagues in the workplace. Drawing on qualitative interviews with reservists, it analyses their understandings of civilian co-workers’ qualified and sometimes reluctant acceptance in light of FR2020’s implicit aim to use reservists to help realign civil–military relationships. While it appears that civilian work colleagues’ social distancing of reservists helps consolidate the wider public’s perceived lack of understanding of the British armed forces, a more critical view sees reservists’ largely unchallenged presence in the workplace as an exemplary, yet subtle instance of militarization. This is because reservists’ simultaneous (physical) inclusion and (social) distancing or stigmatization constitutes, and is constitutive of, their need to pass as civilian. In conclusion, we argue that a key implication of their passing as civilian is to neutralize debate of the legitimacy–or otherwise–of the armed forces as an institution tasked with violence on behalf of the state.",
keywords = "civilian perception, militarization, Military reservists, stigma",
author = "Paul Higate and Antonia Dawes and Tim Edmunds and Jenkings, {K. Neil} and Rachel Woodward",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/23337486.2018.1554941",
language = "English",
journal = "Critical Military Studies",
issn = "2333-7486",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Militarization, stigma, and resistance

T2 - negotiating military reservist identity in the civilian workplace

AU - Higate, Paul

AU - Dawes, Antonia

AU - Edmunds, Tim

AU - Jenkings, K. Neil

AU - Woodward, Rachel

PY - 2019/1/10

Y1 - 2019/1/10

N2 - Set against the backdrop of the British Government’s Future Reserves 2020 (FR2020) programme, this article addresses military reservists’ experiences of how they are perceived by civilian colleagues in the workplace. Drawing on qualitative interviews with reservists, it analyses their understandings of civilian co-workers’ qualified and sometimes reluctant acceptance in light of FR2020’s implicit aim to use reservists to help realign civil–military relationships. While it appears that civilian work colleagues’ social distancing of reservists helps consolidate the wider public’s perceived lack of understanding of the British armed forces, a more critical view sees reservists’ largely unchallenged presence in the workplace as an exemplary, yet subtle instance of militarization. This is because reservists’ simultaneous (physical) inclusion and (social) distancing or stigmatization constitutes, and is constitutive of, their need to pass as civilian. In conclusion, we argue that a key implication of their passing as civilian is to neutralize debate of the legitimacy–or otherwise–of the armed forces as an institution tasked with violence on behalf of the state.

AB - Set against the backdrop of the British Government’s Future Reserves 2020 (FR2020) programme, this article addresses military reservists’ experiences of how they are perceived by civilian colleagues in the workplace. Drawing on qualitative interviews with reservists, it analyses their understandings of civilian co-workers’ qualified and sometimes reluctant acceptance in light of FR2020’s implicit aim to use reservists to help realign civil–military relationships. While it appears that civilian work colleagues’ social distancing of reservists helps consolidate the wider public’s perceived lack of understanding of the British armed forces, a more critical view sees reservists’ largely unchallenged presence in the workplace as an exemplary, yet subtle instance of militarization. This is because reservists’ simultaneous (physical) inclusion and (social) distancing or stigmatization constitutes, and is constitutive of, their need to pass as civilian. In conclusion, we argue that a key implication of their passing as civilian is to neutralize debate of the legitimacy–or otherwise–of the armed forces as an institution tasked with violence on behalf of the state.

KW - civilian perception

KW - militarization

KW - Military reservists

KW - stigma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059898183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23337486.2018.1554941

DO - 10.1080/23337486.2018.1554941

M3 - Article

JO - Critical Military Studies

JF - Critical Military Studies

SN - 2333-7486

ER -