Micropollutant fluxes in urban environment – A catchment perspective

Kathryn Proctor, Bruce Petrie, Luigi Lopardo, Dolores Camacho Muñoz, Jack Rice, Ruth Barden, Tom Arnot, Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study provided a holistic understanding of the sources, fate and behaviour of 142 compounds of emerging concern (CECs) throughout a river catchment impacted by 5 major urban areas. Of the incoming 169.3 kg d−1 of CECs entering the WwTWs, 167.9 kg d−1 were present in the liquid phase of influent and 1.4 kg d−1 were present in the solid phase (solid particulate matter, SPM). Analysis of SPM was important to determine accurate loads of incoming antidepressants and antifungal compounds, which are primarily found in the solid phase. Furthermore, these classes and the plasticiser, bisphenol A (BPA) were the highest contributors to CEC load in digested solids. Population normalised loads showed little variation across the catchment at 154 ± 12 mg d−1 inhabitant–1 indicating that population size is the main driver of CECs in the studied catchment. Across the catchment 154.6 kg d−1 were removed from the liquid phase during treatment processes. CECs discharged into surface waters from individual WwTWs contributed between 0.19 kg d–1 at WwTW A to 7.3 kg d−1 at WwTW E, which correlated strongly with the respective contributing populations. Spatial and temporal variations of individual CECs and their respective classes were found in WwTW influent (both solid (influentSPM) and liquid phases (influentAQ)) throughout the catchment, showing that different urban areas impact the catchment in different ways, with key variables being lifestyle, use of over-the-counter pharmaceuticals and industrial activity. Understanding of both spatial and temporal variation of CECs at the catchment level helped to identify possible instances of direct disposal, as in the case of carbamazepine. Analysis of surface waters throughout the catchment showed increasing mass loads of CECs from upstream of WwTW A to downstream at WwTW D, showing clear individual contributions from WwTWs. Many CECs were ubiquitous throughout the river water in the catchment. Daily loads ranged from 0.005 g d-1 (ketamine, WwTW A) up to 1890.3 g d-1 (metformin, WwTW C) for the 84/138 CECs that were detected downstream of the WwTWs. For metformin this represents the equivalent of ∼1,890 tablets (1,000 mg per tablet) dissolved in the river water downstream of WwTW C.

Original languageEnglish
Article number123745
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials
Volume401
Early online date23 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Aug 2020

Keywords

  • Chemicals of emerging concern
  • Endocrine disruptors
  • Personal care products
  • Pesticides
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • River
  • Solids
  • Wastewater

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Projects

Cite this