Microfinance North and South: Contrasting Current Debates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 17 Citations

Abstract

This paper sets out to examine the apparent consensus around microfinance as a tool to address poverty and social exclusion in North and South. The current emphasis on scale and sustainability in Southern microfinance practice fits the counter revolution in development thought but contrasts with the origins of community banking in the North. The roots of the latter lie in a critique of mainstream economic and financial systems and seeks to re-invent them in ways that bring social, economic and environmental costs and benefits into focus. The role of microfinance in building sustainable livelihoods, both economic and social, is then examined. Finally, it is suggested that, as with any intervention, microfinance has no inherent capability to address gender inequities but must be deliberately made to do so. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
LanguageEnglish
Pages799-810
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of International Development
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

microfinance
financial system
social exclusion
economic system
banking
economics
social economics
livelihood
poverty
gender
exclusion
sustainability
costs
community

Cite this

Microfinance North and South: Contrasting Current Debates. / Johnson, S.

In: Journal of International Development, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1998, p. 799-810.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1dec5e64b6d24322b5a966c7d955f225,
title = "Microfinance North and South: Contrasting Current Debates",
abstract = "This paper sets out to examine the apparent consensus around microfinance as a tool to address poverty and social exclusion in North and South. The current emphasis on scale and sustainability in Southern microfinance practice fits the counter revolution in development thought but contrasts with the origins of community banking in the North. The roots of the latter lie in a critique of mainstream economic and financial systems and seeks to re-invent them in ways that bring social, economic and environmental costs and benefits into focus. The role of microfinance in building sustainable livelihoods, both economic and social, is then examined. Finally, it is suggested that, as with any intervention, microfinance has no inherent capability to address gender inequities but must be deliberately made to do so. {\circledC} 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "S Johnson",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(1998090)10:6<799::AID-JID556>3.0.CO;2-D",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "799--810",
journal = "Journal of International Development",
issn = "0954-1748",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microfinance North and South: Contrasting Current Debates

AU - Johnson,S

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This paper sets out to examine the apparent consensus around microfinance as a tool to address poverty and social exclusion in North and South. The current emphasis on scale and sustainability in Southern microfinance practice fits the counter revolution in development thought but contrasts with the origins of community banking in the North. The roots of the latter lie in a critique of mainstream economic and financial systems and seeks to re-invent them in ways that bring social, economic and environmental costs and benefits into focus. The role of microfinance in building sustainable livelihoods, both economic and social, is then examined. Finally, it is suggested that, as with any intervention, microfinance has no inherent capability to address gender inequities but must be deliberately made to do so. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - This paper sets out to examine the apparent consensus around microfinance as a tool to address poverty and social exclusion in North and South. The current emphasis on scale and sustainability in Southern microfinance practice fits the counter revolution in development thought but contrasts with the origins of community banking in the North. The roots of the latter lie in a critique of mainstream economic and financial systems and seeks to re-invent them in ways that bring social, economic and environmental costs and benefits into focus. The role of microfinance in building sustainable livelihoods, both economic and social, is then examined. Finally, it is suggested that, as with any intervention, microfinance has no inherent capability to address gender inequities but must be deliberately made to do so. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(1998090)10:6<799::AID-JID556>3.0.CO;2-D

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(1998090)10:6<799::AID-JID556>3.0.CO;2-D

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(1998090)10:6<799::AID-JID556>3.0.CO;2-D

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 799

EP - 810

JO - Journal of International Development

T2 - Journal of International Development

JF - Journal of International Development

SN - 0954-1748

IS - 6

ER -