Methodological insights from a rigorous small scale design experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)
118 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper discusses the methods used to conduct high quality small-scale design experiments. It aims to provide a demonstrator promoting the uptake of more rigorous methods in design research and based on this it aims to specify a body of further work for linking study types and contexts. A small-scale experiment was conducted using methods specifically developed to mitigate four core problem areas identified from review: context, system understanding, methods and controls. Thetechniques were then critiqued in detail and used to draw several insights for design researchers including the value of control techniques and triangulation of metrics. Finally, the critique is used to specify further research aimed at linking design experimentation and design practice more effectively for design research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)208-235
Number of pages28
JournalDesign Studies
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

experiment
research planning
Experiments
triangulation
Triangulation
Experiment
Values

Cite this

Methodological insights from a rigorous small scale design experiment. / Cash, Philip; Elias, Edward; Dekoninck, Elies A; Culley, Stephen.

In: Design Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2, 03.2012, p. 208-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08025ec0fd7a4c9e8304a177da080895,
title = "Methodological insights from a rigorous small scale design experiment",
abstract = "This paper discusses the methods used to conduct high quality small-scale design experiments. It aims to provide a demonstrator promoting the uptake of more rigorous methods in design research and based on this it aims to specify a body of further work for linking study types and contexts. A small-scale experiment was conducted using methods specifically developed to mitigate four core problem areas identified from review: context, system understanding, methods and controls. Thetechniques were then critiqued in detail and used to draw several insights for design researchers including the value of control techniques and triangulation of metrics. Finally, the critique is used to specify further research aimed at linking design experimentation and design practice more effectively for design research.",
author = "Philip Cash and Edward Elias and Dekoninck, {Elies A} and Stephen Culley",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.008",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "208--235",
journal = "Design Studies",
issn = "0142-694X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological insights from a rigorous small scale design experiment

AU - Cash, Philip

AU - Elias, Edward

AU - Dekoninck, Elies A

AU - Culley, Stephen

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - This paper discusses the methods used to conduct high quality small-scale design experiments. It aims to provide a demonstrator promoting the uptake of more rigorous methods in design research and based on this it aims to specify a body of further work for linking study types and contexts. A small-scale experiment was conducted using methods specifically developed to mitigate four core problem areas identified from review: context, system understanding, methods and controls. Thetechniques were then critiqued in detail and used to draw several insights for design researchers including the value of control techniques and triangulation of metrics. Finally, the critique is used to specify further research aimed at linking design experimentation and design practice more effectively for design research.

AB - This paper discusses the methods used to conduct high quality small-scale design experiments. It aims to provide a demonstrator promoting the uptake of more rigorous methods in design research and based on this it aims to specify a body of further work for linking study types and contexts. A small-scale experiment was conducted using methods specifically developed to mitigate four core problem areas identified from review: context, system understanding, methods and controls. Thetechniques were then critiqued in detail and used to draw several insights for design researchers including the value of control techniques and triangulation of metrics. Finally, the critique is used to specify further research aimed at linking design experimentation and design practice more effectively for design research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857648303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.008

U2 - 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.008

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 208

EP - 235

JO - Design Studies

JF - Design Studies

SN - 0142-694X

IS - 2

ER -