Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest

R E Beardmore, I Gudelj, D A Lipson, Laurence D Hurst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How is diversity maintained? Environmental heterogeneity is considered to be important(1), yet diversity in seemingly homogeneous environments is nonetheless observed(2). This, it is assumed, must either be owing to weak selection, mutational input or a fitness advantage to genotypes when rare(1). Here we demonstrate the possibility of a new general mechanism of stable diversity maintenance, one that stems from metabolic and physiological trade-offs(3). The model requires that such trade-offs translate into a fitness landscape in which the most fit has unfit near-mutational neighbours, and a lower fitness peak also exists that is more mutationally robust. The 'survival of the fittest' applies at low mutation rates, giving way to 'survival of the flattest'(4-6) at high mutation rates. However, as a consequence of quasispecies-level negative frequency-dependent selection and differences in mutational robustness we observe a transition zone in which both fittest and flattest coexist. Although diversity maintenance is possible for simple organisms in simple environments, the more trade-offs there are, the wider the maintenance zone becomes. The principle may be applied to lineages within a species or species within a community, potentially explaining why competitive exclusion need not be observed in homogeneous environments. This principle predicts the enigmatic richness of metabolic strategies in clonal bacteria(7) and questions the safety of lethal mutagenesis(8,9) as an antimicrobial treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)342-346
Number of pages5
JournalNature
Volume472
Issue number7343
Early online date27 Mar 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2011

Fingerprint

fitness
mutation
transition zone
genotype
safety
bacterium
rate
organism
need

Cite this

Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest. / Beardmore, R E; Gudelj, I; Lipson, D A; Hurst, Laurence D.

In: Nature, Vol. 472, No. 7343, 21.04.2011, p. 342-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beardmore, R E ; Gudelj, I ; Lipson, D A ; Hurst, Laurence D. / Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest. In: Nature. 2011 ; Vol. 472, No. 7343. pp. 342-346.
@article{40bf2275135147b1b79fb85bf49a2ad6,
title = "Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest",
abstract = "How is diversity maintained? Environmental heterogeneity is considered to be important(1), yet diversity in seemingly homogeneous environments is nonetheless observed(2). This, it is assumed, must either be owing to weak selection, mutational input or a fitness advantage to genotypes when rare(1). Here we demonstrate the possibility of a new general mechanism of stable diversity maintenance, one that stems from metabolic and physiological trade-offs(3). The model requires that such trade-offs translate into a fitness landscape in which the most fit has unfit near-mutational neighbours, and a lower fitness peak also exists that is more mutationally robust. The 'survival of the fittest' applies at low mutation rates, giving way to 'survival of the flattest'(4-6) at high mutation rates. However, as a consequence of quasispecies-level negative frequency-dependent selection and differences in mutational robustness we observe a transition zone in which both fittest and flattest coexist. Although diversity maintenance is possible for simple organisms in simple environments, the more trade-offs there are, the wider the maintenance zone becomes. The principle may be applied to lineages within a species or species within a community, potentially explaining why competitive exclusion need not be observed in homogeneous environments. This principle predicts the enigmatic richness of metabolic strategies in clonal bacteria(7) and questions the safety of lethal mutagenesis(8,9) as an antimicrobial treatment.",
author = "Beardmore, {R E} and I Gudelj and Lipson, {D A} and Hurst, {Laurence D}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1038/nature09905",
language = "English",
volume = "472",
pages = "342--346",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7343",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metabolic trade-offs and the maintenance of the fittest and the flattest

AU - Beardmore, R E

AU - Gudelj, I

AU - Lipson, D A

AU - Hurst, Laurence D

PY - 2011/4/21

Y1 - 2011/4/21

N2 - How is diversity maintained? Environmental heterogeneity is considered to be important(1), yet diversity in seemingly homogeneous environments is nonetheless observed(2). This, it is assumed, must either be owing to weak selection, mutational input or a fitness advantage to genotypes when rare(1). Here we demonstrate the possibility of a new general mechanism of stable diversity maintenance, one that stems from metabolic and physiological trade-offs(3). The model requires that such trade-offs translate into a fitness landscape in which the most fit has unfit near-mutational neighbours, and a lower fitness peak also exists that is more mutationally robust. The 'survival of the fittest' applies at low mutation rates, giving way to 'survival of the flattest'(4-6) at high mutation rates. However, as a consequence of quasispecies-level negative frequency-dependent selection and differences in mutational robustness we observe a transition zone in which both fittest and flattest coexist. Although diversity maintenance is possible for simple organisms in simple environments, the more trade-offs there are, the wider the maintenance zone becomes. The principle may be applied to lineages within a species or species within a community, potentially explaining why competitive exclusion need not be observed in homogeneous environments. This principle predicts the enigmatic richness of metabolic strategies in clonal bacteria(7) and questions the safety of lethal mutagenesis(8,9) as an antimicrobial treatment.

AB - How is diversity maintained? Environmental heterogeneity is considered to be important(1), yet diversity in seemingly homogeneous environments is nonetheless observed(2). This, it is assumed, must either be owing to weak selection, mutational input or a fitness advantage to genotypes when rare(1). Here we demonstrate the possibility of a new general mechanism of stable diversity maintenance, one that stems from metabolic and physiological trade-offs(3). The model requires that such trade-offs translate into a fitness landscape in which the most fit has unfit near-mutational neighbours, and a lower fitness peak also exists that is more mutationally robust. The 'survival of the fittest' applies at low mutation rates, giving way to 'survival of the flattest'(4-6) at high mutation rates. However, as a consequence of quasispecies-level negative frequency-dependent selection and differences in mutational robustness we observe a transition zone in which both fittest and flattest coexist. Although diversity maintenance is possible for simple organisms in simple environments, the more trade-offs there are, the wider the maintenance zone becomes. The principle may be applied to lineages within a species or species within a community, potentially explaining why competitive exclusion need not be observed in homogeneous environments. This principle predicts the enigmatic richness of metabolic strategies in clonal bacteria(7) and questions the safety of lethal mutagenesis(8,9) as an antimicrobial treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955476606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09905

U2 - 10.1038/nature09905

DO - 10.1038/nature09905

M3 - Article

VL - 472

SP - 342

EP - 346

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 7343

ER -