MERCOSUR

what you see is not (always) what you get

Gian Luca Gardini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty years after its creation MERCOSUR is not a common market yet; its regional parliament has virtually no competence; its first enlargement has been pending ratification for five years. However, MERCOSUR has delivered democratic stability, increased trade flows and international visibility to its members. This article proposes a historical-institutionalist approach to reconcile more and less optimistic appraisals. The historical component suggests that MERCOSUR has evolved according to the evolution of national interests and agendas. The institutional component suggests that the limited and peculiar institutionalisation affects MERCOSUR's functionality and prospects. The article first reviews the historical evolution of MERCOSUR, then concentrates on the current agenda including the accession of Venezuela, the question of the regional parliament and the completion of the customs union, and finally explores the challenges Documentos de Seguridad y Defensa No. 29, Madrid, January 2010 that competing regional blocs pose to MERCOSUR. The conclusion suggests that institutional deepening might take place via parliamentary and judicial developments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)683-700
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Law Journal
Volume17
Issue number5
Early online date31 Jul 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

MERCOSUR
parliament
customs union
ratification
Venezuela
institutionalization
functionality
market

Cite this

MERCOSUR : what you see is not (always) what you get. / Gardini, Gian Luca.

In: European Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 5, 09.2011, p. 683-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gardini, Gian Luca. / MERCOSUR : what you see is not (always) what you get. In: European Law Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 683-700.
@article{194519e8254f43cd892f11954d414e94,
title = "MERCOSUR: what you see is not (always) what you get",
abstract = "Twenty years after its creation MERCOSUR is not a common market yet; its regional parliament has virtually no competence; its first enlargement has been pending ratification for five years. However, MERCOSUR has delivered democratic stability, increased trade flows and international visibility to its members. This article proposes a historical-institutionalist approach to reconcile more and less optimistic appraisals. The historical component suggests that MERCOSUR has evolved according to the evolution of national interests and agendas. The institutional component suggests that the limited and peculiar institutionalisation affects MERCOSUR's functionality and prospects. The article first reviews the historical evolution of MERCOSUR, then concentrates on the current agenda including the accession of Venezuela, the question of the regional parliament and the completion of the customs union, and finally explores the challenges Documentos de Seguridad y Defensa No. 29, Madrid, January 2010 that competing regional blocs pose to MERCOSUR. The conclusion suggests that institutional deepening might take place via parliamentary and judicial developments.",
author = "Gardini, {Gian Luca}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00573.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "683--700",
journal = "European Law Journal",
issn = "1351-5993",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MERCOSUR

T2 - what you see is not (always) what you get

AU - Gardini, Gian Luca

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Twenty years after its creation MERCOSUR is not a common market yet; its regional parliament has virtually no competence; its first enlargement has been pending ratification for five years. However, MERCOSUR has delivered democratic stability, increased trade flows and international visibility to its members. This article proposes a historical-institutionalist approach to reconcile more and less optimistic appraisals. The historical component suggests that MERCOSUR has evolved according to the evolution of national interests and agendas. The institutional component suggests that the limited and peculiar institutionalisation affects MERCOSUR's functionality and prospects. The article first reviews the historical evolution of MERCOSUR, then concentrates on the current agenda including the accession of Venezuela, the question of the regional parliament and the completion of the customs union, and finally explores the challenges Documentos de Seguridad y Defensa No. 29, Madrid, January 2010 that competing regional blocs pose to MERCOSUR. The conclusion suggests that institutional deepening might take place via parliamentary and judicial developments.

AB - Twenty years after its creation MERCOSUR is not a common market yet; its regional parliament has virtually no competence; its first enlargement has been pending ratification for five years. However, MERCOSUR has delivered democratic stability, increased trade flows and international visibility to its members. This article proposes a historical-institutionalist approach to reconcile more and less optimistic appraisals. The historical component suggests that MERCOSUR has evolved according to the evolution of national interests and agendas. The institutional component suggests that the limited and peculiar institutionalisation affects MERCOSUR's functionality and prospects. The article first reviews the historical evolution of MERCOSUR, then concentrates on the current agenda including the accession of Venezuela, the question of the regional parliament and the completion of the customs union, and finally explores the challenges Documentos de Seguridad y Defensa No. 29, Madrid, January 2010 that competing regional blocs pose to MERCOSUR. The conclusion suggests that institutional deepening might take place via parliamentary and judicial developments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961011061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00573.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00573.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00573.x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 683

EP - 700

JO - European Law Journal

JF - European Law Journal

SN - 1351-5993

IS - 5

ER -