Abstract
The present research provides the first direct assessment of the fit of diverse behaviors to putatively related personal and social values from Schwartz’s theory. Across three studies, we examined spatial representations of value-related behaviors that were explicitly derived from people’s mental representations of the values. Participants were asked how similar the behaviors were to each other and various values, and these judgments were used to specify multidimensional scaling solutions. The results indicated that the spatial representation of the behaviors was consistent with the two-dimensional space described in Schwartz’s model of values, although several deviations occurred. For example, self-enhancement behaviors were widely spread, indicating more variation in the way individuals interpret these behaviors, which are often associated with other value types. These data provide evidence that a range of behaviors can at least partly be reduced to underlying motivations expressed by values. Furthermore, our findings indicate that behaviors are often expressed by several values, which might help to explain why value–behavior associations in previous studies were weak. Finally, they illustrate a new approach to learning which behaviors might relate to multiple values.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 926-941 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | European Journal of Personality |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 25 Jul 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Nov 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study received financial support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES Foundation, Brazil; Proc. 99999.013718/2013-04 to G. L. D. H. C.), and from the School of Psychology, Cardiff University (psych.cf.ac.uk) and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC; www.esrc.ac.uk ) to P. H. P. H. (ES/J500197/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The studies reported here and in the Supplemental Materials, alongside parts of the Introduction and General Discussion, are described in the PhD thesis of the first author (Coelho, 2018).
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study received financial support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES Foundation, Brazil; Proc. 99999.013718/2013-04 to G. L. D. H. C.), and from the School of Psychology, Cardiff University (psych.cf.ac.uk) and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC; www.esrc.ac.uk) to P. H. P. H. (ES/J500197/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The studies reported here and in the Supplemental Materials, alongside parts of the Introduction and General Discussion, are described in the PhD thesis of the first author (Coelho, 2018).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
Keywords
- Schwartz
- behaviors
- human values
- similarity judgments
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology