Mental models and social representations of hazards

the significance of identity processes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the social influence processes that underpin the development of individual mental models of hazards and analyses the role that identity processes play in determining the nature and plasticity of the representations of risk that an individual will employ. It outlines the nature of the mental models approach (Morgan, Fischhoff, Bostrom and Atman, in press) to developing interventions in risk communication. It describes how social representations theory (Moscovici, 1988) can be used to account for the genesis and maintenance of a mental model of a hazard. In doing so, it is argued that mental models of hazards are social constructions, serving identifiable social purposes for the subculture in which they are elaborated, and that they are generally shared by the members of that subculture. However, within a group or subculture, there will be some individual variation in access to and use of a mental model of a hazard. It is suggested here that these variations are largely predictable on the basis of identity processes (Breakwell, in press). The implications of this analysis for risk communication strategies is explored.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-351
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2001

Fingerprint

Hazards
subculture
risk communication
role identity
Communication
social construction
Plasticity
Social representations
Hazard
Mental models
Subculture
Group
Risk communication

Cite this

Mental models and social representations of hazards : the significance of identity processes. / Breakwell, Glynis M.

In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 4, No. 4, 10.2001, p. 341-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90b4da02655640bfab7d33c6ee0f675b,
title = "Mental models and social representations of hazards: the significance of identity processes",
abstract = "This article examines the social influence processes that underpin the development of individual mental models of hazards and analyses the role that identity processes play in determining the nature and plasticity of the representations of risk that an individual will employ. It outlines the nature of the mental models approach (Morgan, Fischhoff, Bostrom and Atman, in press) to developing interventions in risk communication. It describes how social representations theory (Moscovici, 1988) can be used to account for the genesis and maintenance of a mental model of a hazard. In doing so, it is argued that mental models of hazards are social constructions, serving identifiable social purposes for the subculture in which they are elaborated, and that they are generally shared by the members of that subculture. However, within a group or subculture, there will be some individual variation in access to and use of a mental model of a hazard. It is suggested here that these variations are largely predictable on the basis of identity processes (Breakwell, in press). The implications of this analysis for risk communication strategies is explored.",
author = "Breakwell, {Glynis M.}",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/13669870110062730",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "341--351",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental models and social representations of hazards

T2 - the significance of identity processes

AU - Breakwell, Glynis M.

PY - 2001/10

Y1 - 2001/10

N2 - This article examines the social influence processes that underpin the development of individual mental models of hazards and analyses the role that identity processes play in determining the nature and plasticity of the representations of risk that an individual will employ. It outlines the nature of the mental models approach (Morgan, Fischhoff, Bostrom and Atman, in press) to developing interventions in risk communication. It describes how social representations theory (Moscovici, 1988) can be used to account for the genesis and maintenance of a mental model of a hazard. In doing so, it is argued that mental models of hazards are social constructions, serving identifiable social purposes for the subculture in which they are elaborated, and that they are generally shared by the members of that subculture. However, within a group or subculture, there will be some individual variation in access to and use of a mental model of a hazard. It is suggested here that these variations are largely predictable on the basis of identity processes (Breakwell, in press). The implications of this analysis for risk communication strategies is explored.

AB - This article examines the social influence processes that underpin the development of individual mental models of hazards and analyses the role that identity processes play in determining the nature and plasticity of the representations of risk that an individual will employ. It outlines the nature of the mental models approach (Morgan, Fischhoff, Bostrom and Atman, in press) to developing interventions in risk communication. It describes how social representations theory (Moscovici, 1988) can be used to account for the genesis and maintenance of a mental model of a hazard. In doing so, it is argued that mental models of hazards are social constructions, serving identifiable social purposes for the subculture in which they are elaborated, and that they are generally shared by the members of that subculture. However, within a group or subculture, there will be some individual variation in access to and use of a mental model of a hazard. It is suggested here that these variations are largely predictable on the basis of identity processes (Breakwell, in press). The implications of this analysis for risk communication strategies is explored.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870110062730

U2 - 10.1080/13669870110062730

DO - 10.1080/13669870110062730

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 341

EP - 351

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 4

ER -