Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In recent years, the rise of Islamic State (IS) and their high-profile use of extreme violence in Syria has been used to shock the public and, in turn, stimulate a militarized response from the wider international community. For many, the violence perpetrated by IS exemplifies a deeply visceral form of insecurity, where the use of social media by the group renders horrific imagery instantly accessible to its geographically disparate audience. What most analyses of this and other contemporary conflicts miss is that gender is vital to thinking about what violence is in global politics, and that conflict should often be viewed in light of what I call the men-masculinity-security nexus. In this chapter, discussion of men, masculinity, and global insecurity is organized into three main sections. It opens with an overview of men and (in)security in global politics before considering complexity in gender identity alongside feminist-influenced explanations for insecurity. It then considers a binary marked by forms of ‘bestial’ masculinity, contrasting a beheading video at one end of the spectrum with an account of a rational and heroic former soldier who travels to fight the ‘extremists’. Finally, in moving beyond the oppositional framing of these groups as ‘uncivilized’ and ‘civilized’, respectively, this chapter argues that, when viewed through the lens of masculinity, there is a good degree of commonality in gendered identity and practice across contexts. The particular commonality on which it focuses is the common perception that militarized violence is effective and desirable. Varied claims to state or non-state group masculinity are manifested in fairly similar resorts to violence – a perception that can inspire violent cycles of insecurity. The chapter concludes by considering the nexus linking masculinity, insecurity and global politics theoretically. © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Caron E. Gentry, Laura J.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of Gender and Security
EditorsLaura Sjoberg, Caron Gentry, Laura Shepherd
Place of PublicationLondon, U. K.
PublisherRoutledge
Pages70-82
ISBN (Print)9781315525082
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Cite this

Higate, P. (2018). Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State. In L. Sjoberg, C. Gentry, & L. Shepherd (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security (pp. 70-82). London, U. K.: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315525099

Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State. / Higate, Paul.

Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security . ed. / Laura Sjoberg; Caron Gentry; Laura Shepherd. London, U. K. : Routledge, 2018. p. 70-82.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Higate, P 2018, Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State. in L Sjoberg, C Gentry & L Shepherd (eds), Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security . Routledge, London, U. K., pp. 70-82. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315525099
Higate P. Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State. In Sjoberg L, Gentry C, Shepherd L, editors, Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security . London, U. K.: Routledge. 2018. p. 70-82 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315525099
Higate, Paul. / Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security . editor / Laura Sjoberg ; Caron Gentry ; Laura Shepherd. London, U. K. : Routledge, 2018. pp. 70-82
@inbook{6ef66253e03d47d59626787966e2006c,
title = "Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State",
abstract = "In recent years, the rise of Islamic State (IS) and their high-profile use of extreme violence in Syria has been used to shock the public and, in turn, stimulate a militarized response from the wider international community. For many, the violence perpetrated by IS exemplifies a deeply visceral form of insecurity, where the use of social media by the group renders horrific imagery instantly accessible to its geographically disparate audience. What most analyses of this and other contemporary conflicts miss is that gender is vital to thinking about what violence is in global politics, and that conflict should often be viewed in light of what I call the men-masculinity-security nexus. In this chapter, discussion of men, masculinity, and global insecurity is organized into three main sections. It opens with an overview of men and (in)security in global politics before considering complexity in gender identity alongside feminist-influenced explanations for insecurity. It then considers a binary marked by forms of ‘bestial’ masculinity, contrasting a beheading video at one end of the spectrum with an account of a rational and heroic former soldier who travels to fight the ‘extremists’. Finally, in moving beyond the oppositional framing of these groups as ‘uncivilized’ and ‘civilized’, respectively, this chapter argues that, when viewed through the lens of masculinity, there is a good degree of commonality in gendered identity and practice across contexts. The particular commonality on which it focuses is the common perception that militarized violence is effective and desirable. Varied claims to state or non-state group masculinity are manifested in fairly similar resorts to violence – a perception that can inspire violent cycles of insecurity. The chapter concludes by considering the nexus linking masculinity, insecurity and global politics theoretically. {\circledC} 2019 selection and editorial matter, Caron E. Gentry, Laura J.",
author = "Paul Higate",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781315525099",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781315525082",
pages = "70--82",
editor = "Laura Sjoberg and Caron Gentry and Shepherd, {Laura }",
booktitle = "Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "UK United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Men, masculinity and global insecurity: fighting for and against Islamic State

AU - Higate, Paul

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In recent years, the rise of Islamic State (IS) and their high-profile use of extreme violence in Syria has been used to shock the public and, in turn, stimulate a militarized response from the wider international community. For many, the violence perpetrated by IS exemplifies a deeply visceral form of insecurity, where the use of social media by the group renders horrific imagery instantly accessible to its geographically disparate audience. What most analyses of this and other contemporary conflicts miss is that gender is vital to thinking about what violence is in global politics, and that conflict should often be viewed in light of what I call the men-masculinity-security nexus. In this chapter, discussion of men, masculinity, and global insecurity is organized into three main sections. It opens with an overview of men and (in)security in global politics before considering complexity in gender identity alongside feminist-influenced explanations for insecurity. It then considers a binary marked by forms of ‘bestial’ masculinity, contrasting a beheading video at one end of the spectrum with an account of a rational and heroic former soldier who travels to fight the ‘extremists’. Finally, in moving beyond the oppositional framing of these groups as ‘uncivilized’ and ‘civilized’, respectively, this chapter argues that, when viewed through the lens of masculinity, there is a good degree of commonality in gendered identity and practice across contexts. The particular commonality on which it focuses is the common perception that militarized violence is effective and desirable. Varied claims to state or non-state group masculinity are manifested in fairly similar resorts to violence – a perception that can inspire violent cycles of insecurity. The chapter concludes by considering the nexus linking masculinity, insecurity and global politics theoretically. © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Caron E. Gentry, Laura J.

AB - In recent years, the rise of Islamic State (IS) and their high-profile use of extreme violence in Syria has been used to shock the public and, in turn, stimulate a militarized response from the wider international community. For many, the violence perpetrated by IS exemplifies a deeply visceral form of insecurity, where the use of social media by the group renders horrific imagery instantly accessible to its geographically disparate audience. What most analyses of this and other contemporary conflicts miss is that gender is vital to thinking about what violence is in global politics, and that conflict should often be viewed in light of what I call the men-masculinity-security nexus. In this chapter, discussion of men, masculinity, and global insecurity is organized into three main sections. It opens with an overview of men and (in)security in global politics before considering complexity in gender identity alongside feminist-influenced explanations for insecurity. It then considers a binary marked by forms of ‘bestial’ masculinity, contrasting a beheading video at one end of the spectrum with an account of a rational and heroic former soldier who travels to fight the ‘extremists’. Finally, in moving beyond the oppositional framing of these groups as ‘uncivilized’ and ‘civilized’, respectively, this chapter argues that, when viewed through the lens of masculinity, there is a good degree of commonality in gendered identity and practice across contexts. The particular commonality on which it focuses is the common perception that militarized violence is effective and desirable. Varied claims to state or non-state group masculinity are manifested in fairly similar resorts to violence – a perception that can inspire violent cycles of insecurity. The chapter concludes by considering the nexus linking masculinity, insecurity and global politics theoretically. © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Caron E. Gentry, Laura J.

U2 - 10.4324/9781315525099

DO - 10.4324/9781315525099

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781315525082

SP - 70

EP - 82

BT - Routledge Handbook of Gender and Security

A2 - Sjoberg, Laura

A2 - Gentry, Caron

A2 - Shepherd, Laura

PB - Routledge

CY - London, U. K.

ER -