Membrane protein extraction and purification using styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymer: effect of variations in polymer structure.

Kerrie Morrison, Aneel Akram, Ashlyn Mathews, Zoeya A. Khan, Jaimin H. Patel, Chumin Zhou, David J. Hardy, Charles Moore-Kelly, Roshani Patel, Victor Odiba, Tim J. Knowles, Masood-ul- Hassan Javed, Nikola P. Chmel, Timothy R. Dafforn, Alice J. Rothnie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymers to extract and purify transmembrane proteins, while retaining their native bilayer environment, overcomes many of the disadvantages associated with conventional detergent-based procedures. This approach has huge potential for the future of membrane protein structural and functional studies. In this investigation, we have systematically tested a range of commercially available SMA polymers, varying in both the ratio of styrene and maleic acid and in total size, for the ability to extract, purify and stabilise transmembrane proteins. Three different membrane proteins (BmrA, LeuT and ZipA), which vary in size and shape, were used. Our results show that several polymers, can be used to extract membrane proteins, comparably to conventional detergents. A styrene:maleic acid ratio of either 2:1 or 3:1, combined with a relatively small average molecular mass (7.5–10 kDa), is optimal for membrane extraction, and this appears to be independent of the protein size, shape or expression system. A subset of polymers were taken forward for purification, functional and stability tests. Following a one-step affinity purification, SMA 2000 was found to be the best choice for yield, purity and function. However, the other polymers offer subtle differences in size and sensitivity to divalent cations that may be useful for a variety of downstream applications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4349-4360
Number of pages12
JournalBiochemical Journal
Volume473
Issue number23
Early online date30 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • membrane protein
  • polymer
  • SMALPs; Nanodiscs;SMA
  • protein purification
  • solubilisation

Cite this

Membrane protein extraction and purification using styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymer: effect of variations in polymer structure. / Morrison, Kerrie; Akram, Aneel; Mathews, Ashlyn ; Khan, Zoeya A.; Patel, Jaimin H.; Zhou, Chumin; Hardy, David J.; Moore-Kelly, Charles ; Patel, Roshani; Odiba, Victor ; Knowles, Tim J.; Javed, Masood-ul- Hassan ; Chmel, Nikola P. ; Dafforn, Timothy R.; Rothnie, Alice J.

In: Biochemical Journal, Vol. 473, No. 23, 25.11.2016, p. 4349-4360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morrison, K, Akram, A, Mathews, A, Khan, ZA, Patel, JH, Zhou, C, Hardy, DJ, Moore-Kelly, C, Patel, R, Odiba, V, Knowles, TJ, Javed, MH, Chmel, NP, Dafforn, TR & Rothnie, AJ 2016, 'Membrane protein extraction and purification using styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymer: effect of variations in polymer structure.', Biochemical Journal, vol. 473, no. 23, pp. 4349-4360. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160723
Morrison, Kerrie ; Akram, Aneel ; Mathews, Ashlyn ; Khan, Zoeya A. ; Patel, Jaimin H. ; Zhou, Chumin ; Hardy, David J. ; Moore-Kelly, Charles ; Patel, Roshani ; Odiba, Victor ; Knowles, Tim J. ; Javed, Masood-ul- Hassan ; Chmel, Nikola P. ; Dafforn, Timothy R. ; Rothnie, Alice J. / Membrane protein extraction and purification using styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymer: effect of variations in polymer structure. In: Biochemical Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 473, No. 23. pp. 4349-4360.
@article{08160a8bc9ac40e28ceae360e481a9b2,
title = "Membrane protein extraction and purification using styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymer: effect of variations in polymer structure.",
abstract = "The use of styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymers to extract and purify transmembrane proteins, while retaining their native bilayer environment, overcomes many of the disadvantages associated with conventional detergent-based procedures. This approach has huge potential for the future of membrane protein structural and functional studies. In this investigation, we have systematically tested a range of commercially available SMA polymers, varying in both the ratio of styrene and maleic acid and in total size, for the ability to extract, purify and stabilise transmembrane proteins. Three different membrane proteins (BmrA, LeuT and ZipA), which vary in size and shape, were used. Our results show that several polymers, can be used to extract membrane proteins, comparably to conventional detergents. A styrene:maleic acid ratio of either 2:1 or 3:1, combined with a relatively small average molecular mass (7.5–10 kDa), is optimal for membrane extraction, and this appears to be independent of the protein size, shape or expression system. A subset of polymers were taken forward for purification, functional and stability tests. Following a one-step affinity purification, SMA 2000 was found to be the best choice for yield, purity and function. However, the other polymers offer subtle differences in size and sensitivity to divalent cations that may be useful for a variety of downstream applications.",
keywords = "membrane protein, polymer, SMALPs; Nanodiscs;SMA, protein purification, solubilisation",
author = "Kerrie Morrison and Aneel Akram and Ashlyn Mathews and Khan, {Zoeya A.} and Patel, {Jaimin H.} and Chumin Zhou and Hardy, {David J.} and Charles Moore-Kelly and Roshani Patel and Victor Odiba and Knowles, {Tim J.} and Javed, {Masood-ul- Hassan} and Chmel, {Nikola P.} and Dafforn, {Timothy R.} and Rothnie, {Alice J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1042/BCJ20160723",
language = "English",
volume = "473",
pages = "4349--4360",
journal = "Biochemical Journal",
issn = "0264-6021",
publisher = "Portland Press Ltd.",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Membrane protein extraction and purification using styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymer: effect of variations in polymer structure.

AU - Morrison, Kerrie

AU - Akram, Aneel

AU - Mathews, Ashlyn

AU - Khan, Zoeya A.

AU - Patel, Jaimin H.

AU - Zhou, Chumin

AU - Hardy, David J.

AU - Moore-Kelly, Charles

AU - Patel, Roshani

AU - Odiba, Victor

AU - Knowles, Tim J.

AU - Javed, Masood-ul- Hassan

AU - Chmel, Nikola P.

AU - Dafforn, Timothy R.

AU - Rothnie, Alice J.

PY - 2016/11/25

Y1 - 2016/11/25

N2 - The use of styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymers to extract and purify transmembrane proteins, while retaining their native bilayer environment, overcomes many of the disadvantages associated with conventional detergent-based procedures. This approach has huge potential for the future of membrane protein structural and functional studies. In this investigation, we have systematically tested a range of commercially available SMA polymers, varying in both the ratio of styrene and maleic acid and in total size, for the ability to extract, purify and stabilise transmembrane proteins. Three different membrane proteins (BmrA, LeuT and ZipA), which vary in size and shape, were used. Our results show that several polymers, can be used to extract membrane proteins, comparably to conventional detergents. A styrene:maleic acid ratio of either 2:1 or 3:1, combined with a relatively small average molecular mass (7.5–10 kDa), is optimal for membrane extraction, and this appears to be independent of the protein size, shape or expression system. A subset of polymers were taken forward for purification, functional and stability tests. Following a one-step affinity purification, SMA 2000 was found to be the best choice for yield, purity and function. However, the other polymers offer subtle differences in size and sensitivity to divalent cations that may be useful for a variety of downstream applications.

AB - The use of styrene–maleic acid (SMA) copolymers to extract and purify transmembrane proteins, while retaining their native bilayer environment, overcomes many of the disadvantages associated with conventional detergent-based procedures. This approach has huge potential for the future of membrane protein structural and functional studies. In this investigation, we have systematically tested a range of commercially available SMA polymers, varying in both the ratio of styrene and maleic acid and in total size, for the ability to extract, purify and stabilise transmembrane proteins. Three different membrane proteins (BmrA, LeuT and ZipA), which vary in size and shape, were used. Our results show that several polymers, can be used to extract membrane proteins, comparably to conventional detergents. A styrene:maleic acid ratio of either 2:1 or 3:1, combined with a relatively small average molecular mass (7.5–10 kDa), is optimal for membrane extraction, and this appears to be independent of the protein size, shape or expression system. A subset of polymers were taken forward for purification, functional and stability tests. Following a one-step affinity purification, SMA 2000 was found to be the best choice for yield, purity and function. However, the other polymers offer subtle differences in size and sensitivity to divalent cations that may be useful for a variety of downstream applications.

KW - membrane protein

KW - polymer

KW - SMALPs; Nanodiscs;SMA

KW - protein purification

KW - solubilisation

U2 - 10.1042/BCJ20160723

DO - 10.1042/BCJ20160723

M3 - Article

VL - 473

SP - 4349

EP - 4360

JO - Biochemical Journal

JF - Biochemical Journal

SN - 0264-6021

IS - 23

ER -