Measuring the approximate number system in children: Exploring the relationships among different tasks

Camilla Gilmore, Nina Attridge, Bert De Smedt, Matthew Inglis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 17 Citations

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that children and adults have an Approximate Number System (ANS) which allows individuals to represent and manipulate the representations of the approximate number of items within a set. It has been suggested that individual differences in the precision of the ANS are related to individual differences in mathematics achievement. One difficulty with understanding the role of the ANS, however, is a lack of consistency across studies in tasks used to measure ANS performance. Researchers have used symbolic or nonsymbolic comparison and addition tasks with varying types and sizes of stimuli. Recent studies with adult participants have shown that performance on different ANS tasks is unrelated. Across two studies we demonstrate that, in contrast to adults, children's performance across different ANS tasks, such as symbolic and nonsymbolic comparison or approximate addition, is related. These findings suggest that there are differences across development in the extent to which performance on nonsymbolic and symbolic tasks reflects ANS precision.
LanguageEnglish
Pages50-58
JournalLearning and Individual Differences
Volume29
Early online date16 Nov 2013
DOIs
StatusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Individuality
Mathematics
Research Personnel
performance
Research
stimulus
mathematics
lack

Cite this

Measuring the approximate number system in children : Exploring the relationships among different tasks. / Gilmore, Camilla; Attridge, Nina; De Smedt, Bert ; Inglis, Matthew.

In: Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 29, 01.2014, p. 50-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f026b9a22df24f369ebfdf997514ca9f,
title = "Measuring the approximate number system in children: Exploring the relationships among different tasks",
abstract = "Research has demonstrated that children and adults have an Approximate Number System (ANS) which allows individuals to represent and manipulate the representations of the approximate number of items within a set. It has been suggested that individual differences in the precision of the ANS are related to individual differences in mathematics achievement. One difficulty with understanding the role of the ANS, however, is a lack of consistency across studies in tasks used to measure ANS performance. Researchers have used symbolic or nonsymbolic comparison and addition tasks with varying types and sizes of stimuli. Recent studies with adult participants have shown that performance on different ANS tasks is unrelated. Across two studies we demonstrate that, in contrast to adults, children's performance across different ANS tasks, such as symbolic and nonsymbolic comparison or approximate addition, is related. These findings suggest that there are differences across development in the extent to which performance on nonsymbolic and symbolic tasks reflects ANS precision.",
author = "Camilla Gilmore and Nina Attridge and {De Smedt}, Bert and Matthew Inglis",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.004",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "50--58",
journal = "Learning and Individual Differences",
issn = "1041-6080",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the approximate number system in children

T2 - Learning and Individual Differences

AU - Gilmore,Camilla

AU - Attridge,Nina

AU - De Smedt,Bert

AU - Inglis,Matthew

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Research has demonstrated that children and adults have an Approximate Number System (ANS) which allows individuals to represent and manipulate the representations of the approximate number of items within a set. It has been suggested that individual differences in the precision of the ANS are related to individual differences in mathematics achievement. One difficulty with understanding the role of the ANS, however, is a lack of consistency across studies in tasks used to measure ANS performance. Researchers have used symbolic or nonsymbolic comparison and addition tasks with varying types and sizes of stimuli. Recent studies with adult participants have shown that performance on different ANS tasks is unrelated. Across two studies we demonstrate that, in contrast to adults, children's performance across different ANS tasks, such as symbolic and nonsymbolic comparison or approximate addition, is related. These findings suggest that there are differences across development in the extent to which performance on nonsymbolic and symbolic tasks reflects ANS precision.

AB - Research has demonstrated that children and adults have an Approximate Number System (ANS) which allows individuals to represent and manipulate the representations of the approximate number of items within a set. It has been suggested that individual differences in the precision of the ANS are related to individual differences in mathematics achievement. One difficulty with understanding the role of the ANS, however, is a lack of consistency across studies in tasks used to measure ANS performance. Researchers have used symbolic or nonsymbolic comparison and addition tasks with varying types and sizes of stimuli. Recent studies with adult participants have shown that performance on different ANS tasks is unrelated. Across two studies we demonstrate that, in contrast to adults, children's performance across different ANS tasks, such as symbolic and nonsymbolic comparison or approximate addition, is related. These findings suggest that there are differences across development in the extent to which performance on nonsymbolic and symbolic tasks reflects ANS precision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887963384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.004

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.004

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 50

EP - 58

JO - Learning and Individual Differences

JF - Learning and Individual Differences

SN - 1041-6080

ER -