TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement invariance in longitudinal bifactor models
T2 - review and application based on the p factor
AU - Neufeld, Sharon A.S.
AU - St Clair, Michelle
AU - Brodbeck, Jeannette
AU - Wilkinson, Paul O.
AU - Goodyer, Ian M.
AU - Jones, Peter B
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/6/22
Y1 - 2023/6/22
N2 - Bifactor models are increasingly being utilized to study latent constructs such as psychopathology and cognition, which change over the lifespan. Although longitudinal measurement invariance (MI) testing helps ensure valid interpretation of change in a construct over time, this is rarely and inconsistently performed in bifactor models. Our review of MI simulation literature revealed that only one study assessed MI in bifactor models under limited conditions. Recommendations for how to assess MI in bifactor models are suggested based on existing simulation studies of related models. Estimator choice and influence of missing data on MI are also discussed. An empirical example based on a model of the general psychopathology factor (p) elucidates our recommendations, with the present model of p being the first to exhibit residual MI across gender and time. Thus, changes in the ordered-categorical indicators can be attributed to changes in the latent factors. However, further work is needed to clarify MI guidelines for bifactor models, including considering the impact of model complexity and number of indicators. Nonetheless, using the guidelines justified herein to establish MI allows findings from bifactor models to be more confidently interpreted, increasing their comparability and utility.
AB - Bifactor models are increasingly being utilized to study latent constructs such as psychopathology and cognition, which change over the lifespan. Although longitudinal measurement invariance (MI) testing helps ensure valid interpretation of change in a construct over time, this is rarely and inconsistently performed in bifactor models. Our review of MI simulation literature revealed that only one study assessed MI in bifactor models under limited conditions. Recommendations for how to assess MI in bifactor models are suggested based on existing simulation studies of related models. Estimator choice and influence of missing data on MI are also discussed. An empirical example based on a model of the general psychopathology factor (p) elucidates our recommendations, with the present model of p being the first to exhibit residual MI across gender and time. Thus, changes in the ordered-categorical indicators can be attributed to changes in the latent factors. However, further work is needed to clarify MI guidelines for bifactor models, including considering the impact of model complexity and number of indicators. Nonetheless, using the guidelines justified herein to establish MI allows findings from bifactor models to be more confidently interpreted, increasing their comparability and utility.
KW - longitudinal bifactor modeling
KW - measurement invariance
KW - p factor (general psychopathology)
KW - review
KW - simulation studies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85162687133
U2 - 10.1177/10731911231182687
DO - 10.1177/10731911231182687
M3 - Article
SN - 1073-1911
JO - Assessment
JF - Assessment
ER -