Mapping commercial practices of the pesticide industry to shape science and policymaking: a scoping review

Lisa Scholin, Mark Petticrew, Jeff Collin, Dee Knipe, Rachel Barry, Michael Eddleston, David Gunnell, Melissa J. Pearson, May C.I. van Schalkwyk

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (SciVal)
89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence for how health harming industries (HHIs) engage in similar practices to influence science and policymaking. However, limited attention has been paid to the pesticide industry within the commercial determinants of health (CDOH) field. We conducted a scoping review to map practices adopted by the pesticide industry to influence science and policymaking and to assess the breadth and focus of the associated literature. We included 31 documents and categorized the extracted data using a typology of commercial practices. The documents described how major pesticide companies, and their trade bodies, have acted to influence science and maintain favourable regulatory environments while undermining the credibility of researchers and agencies that publish findings threatening to their commercial interests. A large proportion of the literature consists of historical analyses, narrative reviews, commentaries/perspective pieces, and investigative reports published in the grey literature, predominantly informed by analysis of internal industry documents and freedom of information requests. Most studies focus on high-income settings. There were a limited number of primary peer-reviewed empirical studies that explicitly aimed to study the practices of the pesticide industry from a CDOH perspective. However, our findings show that major pesticide companies adopt political and scientific practices highly similar to other HHIs. The review shows a critical need for research on the pesticide industry’s current practices in low- and middle-income countries where the negative impacts of its activities on health and the environment are likely to be more marked.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberdaaf001
Number of pages19
JournalHealth Promotion International
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date15 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this study are in the public domain.

Funding

The authors would like to thank Donna Watson, subject librarian at University of Edinburgh, for support with developing the search strategy. L.S. receives salary support from the Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention (CPSP), which is funded by a grant from Open Philanthropy, at the recommendation of GiveWell, and has grant funding from the Carnegie Trust. L.S. has previously had grant funding from the Institute for Alcohol Studies. M.Pea. has received funding from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP) on a Young Investigator grant (2018) and salary support on an Investigator Grant, and the Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention (CPSP) has provided salary support. D.K. has received funding from AFSP and CPSP for research related to suicide and self-harm. M.v.S. was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellowship (NIHR3000156) and her research was also partially supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. M.v.S., M.P., and J.C. have funding through and are co-investigators, respectively, in the SPECTRUM consortium, which is funded by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP), a consortium of UK funders [UKRI Research Councils: Medical Research Council (MRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); Charities: British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome and The Health Foundation; Government: Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, Health and Care Research Wales, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and Public Health Agency (NI)]. M.P. has grant funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ‘Three Schools’ Mental Health Programme. L.S. receives salary support from the Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention (CPSP), which is funded by a grant from Open Philanthropy, at the recommendation of GiveWell, and has grant funding from the Carnegie Trust. L.S. has previously had grant funding from the Institute for Alcohol Studies. M.Pea. has received funding from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP) on a Young Investigator grant (2018) and salary support on an Investigator Grant, and the Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention (CPSP) has provided salary support. D.K. has received funding from AFSP and CPSP for research related to suicide and self-harm. M.v.S. was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Doctoral Fellowship (NIHR3000156) and her research was also partially supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. M.v.S., M.P., and J.C. have funding through and are co-investigators, respectively, in the SPECTRUM consortium, which is funded by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP), a consortium of UK funders [UKRI Research Councils: Medical Research Council (MRC), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); Charities: British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome and The Health Foundation; Government: Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, Health and Care Research Wales, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and Public Health Agency (NI)]. M.P. has grant funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ‘Three Schools’ Mental Health Programme.

FundersFunder number
Carnegie Trust
Natural Environment Research Council
Economic and Social Research Council
Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office
National Instruments Corporation
Medical Research Council
University of Edinburgh
NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames
CPSP
Public Health Agency
The Wellcome Trust
Health and Care Research Wales
Cancer Research UK
British Heart Foundation
Institute for Alcohol Studies
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
UK Research and Innovation
National Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR3000156

Keywords

  • commercial determinants of health
  • commercial practices
  • conflicts of interest
  • pesticide industry
  • pesticides
  • public health policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping commercial practices of the pesticide industry to shape science and policymaking: a scoping review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this