Making sense of inquiry sensemaking

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of a report of a Tribunal of Inquiry in order to further our understanding of inquiry team sensemaking. The subject of the paper is the Report of the Allitt Inquiry into attacks on children on Ward Four at Grantham and Kesteven Hospital in the UK. Premised on an understanding of the Report as crystallized sensemaking, and sensemaking as a narrative process, the paper illustrates how authorial strategies centred on issues of normalization, observation, and absolution are employed to create a rhetorical and verisimilitudinous artifact. This, it is argued, is accomplished as part of a more general strategy of depoliticizing the disaster event, legitimating social institutions, (especially those connected with the medical profession), ameliorating anxieties by elaborating fantasies of omnipotence and control, and thenceforth acting as a sensitizing narrative archetype.
LanguageEnglish
Pages45-75
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of management studies
Volume37
Issue number1
StatusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Disasters
Sensemaking
Normalization
Archetypes
Disaster
Anxiety
Attack
Rhetoric
Medical profession
Fantasy
Social institutions

Cite this

Making sense of inquiry sensemaking. / Brown, A D.

In: Journal of management studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2000, p. 45-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0bd6580cd3f47ec9e70ddd3c231e7f2,
title = "Making sense of inquiry sensemaking",
abstract = "This paper presents an analysis of a report of a Tribunal of Inquiry in order to further our understanding of inquiry team sensemaking. The subject of the paper is the Report of the Allitt Inquiry into attacks on children on Ward Four at Grantham and Kesteven Hospital in the UK. Premised on an understanding of the Report as crystallized sensemaking, and sensemaking as a narrative process, the paper illustrates how authorial strategies centred on issues of normalization, observation, and absolution are employed to create a rhetorical and verisimilitudinous artifact. This, it is argued, is accomplished as part of a more general strategy of depoliticizing the disaster event, legitimating social institutions, (especially those connected with the medical profession), ameliorating anxieties by elaborating fantasies of omnipotence and control, and thenceforth acting as a sensitizing narrative archetype.",
author = "Brown, {A D}",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "45--75",
journal = "Journal of management studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of inquiry sensemaking

AU - Brown, A D

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This paper presents an analysis of a report of a Tribunal of Inquiry in order to further our understanding of inquiry team sensemaking. The subject of the paper is the Report of the Allitt Inquiry into attacks on children on Ward Four at Grantham and Kesteven Hospital in the UK. Premised on an understanding of the Report as crystallized sensemaking, and sensemaking as a narrative process, the paper illustrates how authorial strategies centred on issues of normalization, observation, and absolution are employed to create a rhetorical and verisimilitudinous artifact. This, it is argued, is accomplished as part of a more general strategy of depoliticizing the disaster event, legitimating social institutions, (especially those connected with the medical profession), ameliorating anxieties by elaborating fantasies of omnipotence and control, and thenceforth acting as a sensitizing narrative archetype.

AB - This paper presents an analysis of a report of a Tribunal of Inquiry in order to further our understanding of inquiry team sensemaking. The subject of the paper is the Report of the Allitt Inquiry into attacks on children on Ward Four at Grantham and Kesteven Hospital in the UK. Premised on an understanding of the Report as crystallized sensemaking, and sensemaking as a narrative process, the paper illustrates how authorial strategies centred on issues of normalization, observation, and absolution are employed to create a rhetorical and verisimilitudinous artifact. This, it is argued, is accomplished as part of a more general strategy of depoliticizing the disaster event, legitimating social institutions, (especially those connected with the medical profession), ameliorating anxieties by elaborating fantasies of omnipotence and control, and thenceforth acting as a sensitizing narrative archetype.

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 45

EP - 75

JO - Journal of management studies

T2 - Journal of management studies

JF - Journal of management studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 1

ER -