Making a Move in Exercise Referral: Co-Development of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme

B.J.R. Buckley, D.H.J. Thijssen, R.C. Murphy, L.E.F. Graves, G. Whyte, Fiona Gillison, D. Crone, P.M. Wilson, P.M. Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Translational research is required to ensure exercise referral schemes (ERSs) are evidence-based and reflect local needs. This article reports process data from the co-development phase of an ERS, providing an insight into (i) factors that must be considered when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting, and (ii) challenges and facilitators of conducting participatory research involving multiple stakeholders. Methods: An ERS was iteratively co-developed by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group (commissioners, managers, practitioners, patients and academics) via five participatory meetings and an online survey. Audio data (e.g. group discussions) and visual data (e.g. whiteboard notes) were recorded and analysed using NVivo-10 electronic software. Results: Factors to consider when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting included (i) current ERS culture; (ii) skills, safety and accountability; and (iii) resources and capacity. The co-development process was facilitated by needs-analysis, open questions, multidisciplinary debate and reflective practice. Challenges included contrasting views, irregular attendance and (mis)perceptions of evaluation. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary co-development process highlighted cultural and pragmatic issues related to exercise referral provision, resulting in an evidence-based intervention framework designed to be implemented within existing infrastructures. Further work is required to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the co-developed intervention in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberfdy072
Pages (from-to)e586-e593
JournalJournal of Public Health
Volume40
Issue number4
Early online date24 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
Exercise
Translational Medical Research
Social Responsibility
Software
Safety
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Buckley, B. J. R., Thijssen, D. H. J., Murphy, R. C., Graves, L. E. F., Whyte, G., Gillison, F., ... Watson, P. M. (2018). Making a Move in Exercise Referral: Co-Development of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme. Journal of Public Health, 40(4), e586-e593. [fdy072]. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy072

Making a Move in Exercise Referral: Co-Development of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme. / Buckley, B.J.R.; Thijssen, D.H.J.; Murphy, R.C.; Graves, L.E.F.; Whyte, G.; Gillison, Fiona; Crone, D.; Wilson, P.M.; Watson, P.M.

In: Journal of Public Health, Vol. 40, No. 4, fdy072, 01.12.2018, p. e586-e593.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buckley, BJR, Thijssen, DHJ, Murphy, RC, Graves, LEF, Whyte, G, Gillison, F, Crone, D, Wilson, PM & Watson, PM 2018, 'Making a Move in Exercise Referral: Co-Development of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme', Journal of Public Health, vol. 40, no. 4, fdy072, pp. e586-e593. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy072
Buckley, B.J.R. ; Thijssen, D.H.J. ; Murphy, R.C. ; Graves, L.E.F. ; Whyte, G. ; Gillison, Fiona ; Crone, D. ; Wilson, P.M. ; Watson, P.M. / Making a Move in Exercise Referral: Co-Development of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme. In: Journal of Public Health. 2018 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. e586-e593.
@article{12b4398b643647b795cc531dc508a5da,
title = "Making a Move in Exercise Referral: Co-Development of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme",
abstract = "Background: Translational research is required to ensure exercise referral schemes (ERSs) are evidence-based and reflect local needs. This article reports process data from the co-development phase of an ERS, providing an insight into (i) factors that must be considered when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting, and (ii) challenges and facilitators of conducting participatory research involving multiple stakeholders. Methods: An ERS was iteratively co-developed by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group (commissioners, managers, practitioners, patients and academics) via five participatory meetings and an online survey. Audio data (e.g. group discussions) and visual data (e.g. whiteboard notes) were recorded and analysed using NVivo-10 electronic software. Results: Factors to consider when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting included (i) current ERS culture; (ii) skills, safety and accountability; and (iii) resources and capacity. The co-development process was facilitated by needs-analysis, open questions, multidisciplinary debate and reflective practice. Challenges included contrasting views, irregular attendance and (mis)perceptions of evaluation. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary co-development process highlighted cultural and pragmatic issues related to exercise referral provision, resulting in an evidence-based intervention framework designed to be implemented within existing infrastructures. Further work is required to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the co-developed intervention in practice.",
author = "B.J.R. Buckley and D.H.J. Thijssen and R.C. Murphy and L.E.F. Graves and G. Whyte and Fiona Gillison and D. Crone and P.M. Wilson and P.M. Watson",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/pubmed/fdy072",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "e586--e593",
journal = "Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1741-3842",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making a Move in Exercise Referral: Co-Development of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme

AU - Buckley, B.J.R.

AU - Thijssen, D.H.J.

AU - Murphy, R.C.

AU - Graves, L.E.F.

AU - Whyte, G.

AU - Gillison, Fiona

AU - Crone, D.

AU - Wilson, P.M.

AU - Watson, P.M.

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Background: Translational research is required to ensure exercise referral schemes (ERSs) are evidence-based and reflect local needs. This article reports process data from the co-development phase of an ERS, providing an insight into (i) factors that must be considered when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting, and (ii) challenges and facilitators of conducting participatory research involving multiple stakeholders. Methods: An ERS was iteratively co-developed by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group (commissioners, managers, practitioners, patients and academics) via five participatory meetings and an online survey. Audio data (e.g. group discussions) and visual data (e.g. whiteboard notes) were recorded and analysed using NVivo-10 electronic software. Results: Factors to consider when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting included (i) current ERS culture; (ii) skills, safety and accountability; and (iii) resources and capacity. The co-development process was facilitated by needs-analysis, open questions, multidisciplinary debate and reflective practice. Challenges included contrasting views, irregular attendance and (mis)perceptions of evaluation. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary co-development process highlighted cultural and pragmatic issues related to exercise referral provision, resulting in an evidence-based intervention framework designed to be implemented within existing infrastructures. Further work is required to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the co-developed intervention in practice.

AB - Background: Translational research is required to ensure exercise referral schemes (ERSs) are evidence-based and reflect local needs. This article reports process data from the co-development phase of an ERS, providing an insight into (i) factors that must be considered when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting, and (ii) challenges and facilitators of conducting participatory research involving multiple stakeholders. Methods: An ERS was iteratively co-developed by a multidisciplinary stakeholder group (commissioners, managers, practitioners, patients and academics) via five participatory meetings and an online survey. Audio data (e.g. group discussions) and visual data (e.g. whiteboard notes) were recorded and analysed using NVivo-10 electronic software. Results: Factors to consider when translating evidence to practice in an ERS setting included (i) current ERS culture; (ii) skills, safety and accountability; and (iii) resources and capacity. The co-development process was facilitated by needs-analysis, open questions, multidisciplinary debate and reflective practice. Challenges included contrasting views, irregular attendance and (mis)perceptions of evaluation. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary co-development process highlighted cultural and pragmatic issues related to exercise referral provision, resulting in an evidence-based intervention framework designed to be implemented within existing infrastructures. Further work is required to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the co-developed intervention in practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059101249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdy072

DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdy072

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - e586-e593

JO - Journal of Public Health

JF - Journal of Public Health

SN - 1741-3842

IS - 4

M1 - fdy072

ER -