Low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction improves clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation

A single-blind randomized controlled trial

Peter Ladlow, Russell J. Coppack, Shreshth Dharm-Datta, Dean Conway, Edward Sellon, Stephen D. Patterson, Alexander N. Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT). Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention ( p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension ( p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores ( p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group ( p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study. Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1269
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalFrontiers in Physiology
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Muscle Strength
Leg
Knee
Pain
Muscles
Locomotion
Thigh
Hypertrophy
Hip
Inpatients
Lower Extremity
Analysis of Variance
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Exercise
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Blood flow restriction
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Function
  • Hypertrophy
  • Musculoskeletal rehabilitation
  • Pain
  • Strength

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction improves clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation : A single-blind randomized controlled trial. / Ladlow, Peter; Coppack, Russell J.; Dharm-Datta, Shreshth; Conway, Dean; Sellon, Edward; Patterson, Stephen D.; Bennett, Alexander N.

In: Frontiers in Physiology, Vol. 9, 1269, 10.09.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e7ebdac9c444cd19b5180b1e3bf15a6,
title = "Low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction improves clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A single-blind randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT). Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention ( p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension ( p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores ( p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group ( p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study. Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.",
keywords = "Blood flow restriction, Clinical outcomes, Function, Hypertrophy, Musculoskeletal rehabilitation, Pain, Strength",
author = "Peter Ladlow and Coppack, {Russell J.} and Shreshth Dharm-Datta and Dean Conway and Edward Sellon and Patterson, {Stephen D.} and Bennett, {Alexander N.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "10",
doi = "10.3389/fphys.2018.01269",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Frontiers in Physiology",
issn = "1664-042X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction improves clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation

T2 - A single-blind randomized controlled trial

AU - Ladlow, Peter

AU - Coppack, Russell J.

AU - Dharm-Datta, Shreshth

AU - Conway, Dean

AU - Sellon, Edward

AU - Patterson, Stephen D.

AU - Bennett, Alexander N.

PY - 2018/9/10

Y1 - 2018/9/10

N2 - Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT). Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention ( p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension ( p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores ( p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group ( p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study. Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.

AB - Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation. Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT). Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention ( p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension ( p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores ( p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group ( p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study. Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated. Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.

KW - Blood flow restriction

KW - Clinical outcomes

KW - Function

KW - Hypertrophy

KW - Musculoskeletal rehabilitation

KW - Pain

KW - Strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053084445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2018.01269

DO - 10.3389/fphys.2018.01269

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Frontiers in Physiology

JF - Frontiers in Physiology

SN - 1664-042X

M1 - 1269

ER -