TY - JOUR
T1 - Low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction improves clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation
T2 - A single-blind randomized controlled trial
AU - Ladlow, Peter
AU - Coppack, Russell J.
AU - Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
AU - Conway, Dean
AU - Sellon, Edward
AU - Patterson, Stephen D.
AU - Bennett, Alexander N.
PY - 2018/9/10
Y1 - 2018/9/10
N2 -
Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation.
Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study.
Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT).
Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention (
p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension (
p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores (
p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group (
p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study.
Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated.
Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.
AB -
Background: There is growing evidence to support the use of low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) exercise in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of low-load blood flow restricted (LL-BFR) training versus conventional high mechanical load resistance training (RT) on the clinical outcomes of patient's undergoing inpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation.
Study design: A single-blind randomized controlled study.
Methods: Twenty-eight lower-limb injured adults completed a 3-week intensive MDT rehabilitation program. Participants were randomly allocated into a conventional RT (3-days/week) or twice-daily LL-BFR training group. Outcome measurements were taken at baseline and 3-weeks and included quadriceps and total thigh muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume, muscle strength [five repetition maximum (RM) leg press and knee extension test, isometric hip extension], pain and physical function measures (Y-balance test, multistage locomotion test-MSLT).
Results: A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between groups for any outcome measure post-intervention (
p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in mean scores for muscle CSA/volume, 5-RM leg press, and 5-RM knee extension (
p < 0.01) after treatment. LL-BFR group participants also demonstrated significant improvements in MSLT and Y-balance scores (
p < 0.01). The Pain scores during training reduced significantly over time in the LL-BFR group (
p = 0.024), with no adverse events reported during the study.
Conclusion: Comparable improvements in muscle strength and hypertrophy were shown in LL-BFR and conventional training groups following in-patient rehabilitation. The LL-BFR group also achieved significant improvements in functional capacity. LL-BFR training is a rehabilitation tool that has the potential to induce positive adaptations in the absence of high mechanical loads and therefore could be considered a treatment option for patients suffering significant functional deficits for whom conventional loaded RT is contraindicated.
Trial Registration: ISRCTN Reference: ISRCTN63585315, dated 25 April 2017.
KW - Blood flow restriction
KW - Clinical outcomes
KW - Function
KW - Hypertrophy
KW - Musculoskeletal rehabilitation
KW - Pain
KW - Strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053084445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fphys.2018.01269
DO - 10.3389/fphys.2018.01269
M3 - Article
C2 - 30246795
AN - SCOPUS:85053084445
SN - 1664-042X
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Frontiers in Physiology
JF - Frontiers in Physiology
M1 - 1269
ER -