Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Listening to both sides: A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion

Victoria A Sublette, Sian K Smith, Jacob George, Kirsten McCaffery, Mark W Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

This qualitative study compares and contrasts the perspectives of healthcare professionals who treat hepatitis C with those of patients in treatment. Comparative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals and 20 patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C concluded that patients and healthcare professionals disagreed on the source of communication breakdowns, but both felt that individualised clinical information improved adherence. Stigma was recognised as a barrier to treatment adherence by both patients and healthcare professionals. Limitations of the healthcare system, such as patients receiving inconsistent information and long wait times, negatively impacted both patients and providers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1720-1731
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume23
Issue number13
Early online date28 Sept 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Listening to both sides: A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this