Listening to both sides: A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion

Victoria A Sublette, Sian K Smith, Jacob George, Kirsten McCaffery, Mark W Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This qualitative study compares and contrasts the perspectives of healthcare professionals who treat hepatitis C with those of patients in treatment. Comparative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals and 20 patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C concluded that patients and healthcare professionals disagreed on the source of communication breakdowns, but both felt that individualised clinical information improved adherence. Stigma was recognised as a barrier to treatment adherence by both patients and healthcare professionals. Limitations of the healthcare system, such as patients receiving inconsistent information and long wait times, negatively impacted both patients and providers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1720-1731
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume23
Issue number13
Early online date28 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Cite this

Listening to both sides : A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion. / Sublette, Victoria A; Smith, Sian K; George, Jacob; McCaffery, Kirsten; Douglas, Mark W.

In: Journal of Health Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 13, 01.11.2018, p. 1720-1731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9cf744f08d44af5ba5f05479ad65ca3,
title = "Listening to both sides: A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion",
abstract = "This qualitative study compares and contrasts the perspectives of healthcare professionals who treat hepatitis C with those of patients in treatment. Comparative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals and 20 patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C concluded that patients and healthcare professionals disagreed on the source of communication breakdowns, but both felt that individualised clinical information improved adherence. Stigma was recognised as a barrier to treatment adherence by both patients and healthcare professionals. Limitations of the healthcare system, such as patients receiving inconsistent information and long wait times, negatively impacted both patients and providers.",
author = "Sublette, {Victoria A} and Smith, {Sian K} and Jacob George and Kirsten McCaffery and Douglas, {Mark W}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1359105316669858",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1720--1731",
journal = "Journal of Health Psychology",
issn = "1359-1053",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Listening to both sides

T2 - A qualitative comparison between patients with hepatitis C and their healthcare professionals' perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to hepatitis C treatment adherence and completion

AU - Sublette, Victoria A

AU - Smith, Sian K

AU - George, Jacob

AU - McCaffery, Kirsten

AU - Douglas, Mark W

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - This qualitative study compares and contrasts the perspectives of healthcare professionals who treat hepatitis C with those of patients in treatment. Comparative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals and 20 patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C concluded that patients and healthcare professionals disagreed on the source of communication breakdowns, but both felt that individualised clinical information improved adherence. Stigma was recognised as a barrier to treatment adherence by both patients and healthcare professionals. Limitations of the healthcare system, such as patients receiving inconsistent information and long wait times, negatively impacted both patients and providers.

AB - This qualitative study compares and contrasts the perspectives of healthcare professionals who treat hepatitis C with those of patients in treatment. Comparative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 healthcare professionals and 20 patients undergoing treatment for hepatitis C concluded that patients and healthcare professionals disagreed on the source of communication breakdowns, but both felt that individualised clinical information improved adherence. Stigma was recognised as a barrier to treatment adherence by both patients and healthcare professionals. Limitations of the healthcare system, such as patients receiving inconsistent information and long wait times, negatively impacted both patients and providers.

U2 - 10.1177/1359105316669858

DO - 10.1177/1359105316669858

M3 - Article

C2 - 27682337

VL - 23

SP - 1720

EP - 1731

JO - Journal of Health Psychology

JF - Journal of Health Psychology

SN - 1359-1053

IS - 13

ER -