Lifting the veil:

Using a quasi-replication approach to assess sample selection bias in patent-based studies

Paola Criscuolo, Oliver Alexy, Sharapov Dmitry, Ammon Salter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research summary

Patent data is a valued source of information for strategy research. However, patent‐based studies may suffer from sample selection bias given that patents result from within‐firm selection processes and hence do not represent the full population of inventions. We assess how incidental and nonincidental data truncation resulting from firm‐level and inventor‐level selection processes may result in sample selection bias using a quasi‐replication approach, drawing on rich qualitative data and a novel, proprietary dataset of all 40,000 invention disclosures within a large multinational firm. We find that accounting for selection both reaffirms and challenges past work, and discuss the implications of our findings for work on the microfoundations of exploratory innovation activities and for strategy research drawing on patent data.

Managerial summary

Much of what is known about innovation in general, and in particular about what makes inventors prolific, comes from studies that use patent data. However, many ideas are never patented, meaning that these studies may not in reality talk about ideas or inventions, but only about patents. In this paper, we examine the question of whether patent data can accurately be used to represent inventions by using data on all inventions generated within a large multinational firm to explore how and to what degree the selection processes behind firms' patenting decisions may lead to important differences between the two. We find that accounting for selection changes many previously given managerial implications; for example, we show how junior inventors may often not get the credit they deserve.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-252
Number of pages23
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume40
Issue number2
Early online date8 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • appropriability
  • breakthrough inventions
  • learning from failure
  • patent data
  • sample selection bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Lifting the veil: Using a quasi-replication approach to assess sample selection bias in patent-based studies. / Criscuolo, Paola; Alexy, Oliver; Dmitry, Sharapov; Salter, Ammon.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 230-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15fd2c2009994107bb5469f561350082,
title = "Lifting the veil:: Using a quasi-replication approach to assess sample selection bias in patent-based studies",
abstract = "Research summaryPatent data is a valued source of information for strategy research. However, patent‐based studies may suffer from sample selection bias given that patents result from within‐firm selection processes and hence do not represent the full population of inventions. We assess how incidental and nonincidental data truncation resulting from firm‐level and inventor‐level selection processes may result in sample selection bias using a quasi‐replication approach, drawing on rich qualitative data and a novel, proprietary dataset of all 40,000 invention disclosures within a large multinational firm. We find that accounting for selection both reaffirms and challenges past work, and discuss the implications of our findings for work on the microfoundations of exploratory innovation activities and for strategy research drawing on patent data.Managerial summaryMuch of what is known about innovation in general, and in particular about what makes inventors prolific, comes from studies that use patent data. However, many ideas are never patented, meaning that these studies may not in reality talk about ideas or inventions, but only about patents. In this paper, we examine the question of whether patent data can accurately be used to represent inventions by using data on all inventions generated within a large multinational firm to explore how and to what degree the selection processes behind firms' patenting decisions may lead to important differences between the two. We find that accounting for selection changes many previously given managerial implications; for example, we show how junior inventors may often not get the credit they deserve.",
keywords = "appropriability, breakthrough inventions, learning from failure, patent data, sample selection bias",
author = "Paola Criscuolo and Oliver Alexy and Sharapov Dmitry and Ammon Salter",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/smj.2972",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "230--252",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lifting the veil:

T2 - Using a quasi-replication approach to assess sample selection bias in patent-based studies

AU - Criscuolo, Paola

AU - Alexy, Oliver

AU - Dmitry, Sharapov

AU - Salter, Ammon

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Research summaryPatent data is a valued source of information for strategy research. However, patent‐based studies may suffer from sample selection bias given that patents result from within‐firm selection processes and hence do not represent the full population of inventions. We assess how incidental and nonincidental data truncation resulting from firm‐level and inventor‐level selection processes may result in sample selection bias using a quasi‐replication approach, drawing on rich qualitative data and a novel, proprietary dataset of all 40,000 invention disclosures within a large multinational firm. We find that accounting for selection both reaffirms and challenges past work, and discuss the implications of our findings for work on the microfoundations of exploratory innovation activities and for strategy research drawing on patent data.Managerial summaryMuch of what is known about innovation in general, and in particular about what makes inventors prolific, comes from studies that use patent data. However, many ideas are never patented, meaning that these studies may not in reality talk about ideas or inventions, but only about patents. In this paper, we examine the question of whether patent data can accurately be used to represent inventions by using data on all inventions generated within a large multinational firm to explore how and to what degree the selection processes behind firms' patenting decisions may lead to important differences between the two. We find that accounting for selection changes many previously given managerial implications; for example, we show how junior inventors may often not get the credit they deserve.

AB - Research summaryPatent data is a valued source of information for strategy research. However, patent‐based studies may suffer from sample selection bias given that patents result from within‐firm selection processes and hence do not represent the full population of inventions. We assess how incidental and nonincidental data truncation resulting from firm‐level and inventor‐level selection processes may result in sample selection bias using a quasi‐replication approach, drawing on rich qualitative data and a novel, proprietary dataset of all 40,000 invention disclosures within a large multinational firm. We find that accounting for selection both reaffirms and challenges past work, and discuss the implications of our findings for work on the microfoundations of exploratory innovation activities and for strategy research drawing on patent data.Managerial summaryMuch of what is known about innovation in general, and in particular about what makes inventors prolific, comes from studies that use patent data. However, many ideas are never patented, meaning that these studies may not in reality talk about ideas or inventions, but only about patents. In this paper, we examine the question of whether patent data can accurately be used to represent inventions by using data on all inventions generated within a large multinational firm to explore how and to what degree the selection processes behind firms' patenting decisions may lead to important differences between the two. We find that accounting for selection changes many previously given managerial implications; for example, we show how junior inventors may often not get the credit they deserve.

KW - appropriability

KW - breakthrough inventions

KW - learning from failure

KW - patent data

KW - sample selection bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056458723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/smj.2972

DO - 10.1002/smj.2972

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 230

EP - 252

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 2

ER -