TY - JOUR
T1 - Less is more
T2 - a review of low energy standards and the urgent need for an international universal zero energy standard
AU - Williams, Joseph
AU - Mitchell, Rachel
AU - Raicic, Vesna
AU - Vellei, Marika
AU - Mustard, Graham
AU - Wismayer, Amber
AU - Yin, Xunzhi
AU - Davey, Stephen
AU - Shakil, Muzzamil
AU - Yang, Yuanzhang
AU - Parkin, Anna
AU - Coley, David
PY - 2016/6
Y1 - 2016/6
N2 - There are in excess of 70 low or zero energy/carbon building definitions/standards in circulation around the world. However there are few zero energy or zero carbon buildings. This suggests that despite, or possibly because of, a continuing debate over definitions, aspiration has not been met by reality. In this paper the most important 35 standards are reviewed and a correlation between activity in standard generation and completed buildings is presented. Combining this with the requirement for an 80% cut in carbon emissions, a consideration of the proportion of humanity that live in countries without any standards and the ratio of new-build activity vs. pre-existing stock, leads to a conclusion that there is an urgent need for a binding international zero (rather than low) energy/carbon standard that can be adopted world-wide. It is argued this is only possible if carbon is ignored in favour of energy, and many lifecycle issues put to one side. In part this is because of changing national carbon intensities within the energy supply chain, but it is also due to unresolved issues in carbon and energy accountancy. It is hence suggested that such issues are left to optional additional local standards.
AB - There are in excess of 70 low or zero energy/carbon building definitions/standards in circulation around the world. However there are few zero energy or zero carbon buildings. This suggests that despite, or possibly because of, a continuing debate over definitions, aspiration has not been met by reality. In this paper the most important 35 standards are reviewed and a correlation between activity in standard generation and completed buildings is presented. Combining this with the requirement for an 80% cut in carbon emissions, a consideration of the proportion of humanity that live in countries without any standards and the ratio of new-build activity vs. pre-existing stock, leads to a conclusion that there is an urgent need for a binding international zero (rather than low) energy/carbon standard that can be adopted world-wide. It is argued this is only possible if carbon is ignored in favour of energy, and many lifecycle issues put to one side. In part this is because of changing national carbon intensities within the energy supply chain, but it is also due to unresolved issues in carbon and energy accountancy. It is hence suggested that such issues are left to optional additional local standards.
KW - zero energy buildings
KW - building codes
KW - building standards
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.02.007
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.02.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.02.007
M3 - Article
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 6
SP - 65
EP - 74
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
ER -