Learning to suck eggs, or is there a case for a postgraduate development studies benchmark?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many academic disciplines in the UK have recently introduced subject benchmarks that specify core or minimum content for particular degrees. The article suggests that efficiency, quality, and transparency arguments in favour of such benchmarks may be undermined by problems in specification, identification, and implementation. By contrasting the programme specification for the Master's in development studies at Bath (overspecified) with the benchmark for Master's in management and business administration (underspecified), it suggests that an intermediate benchmark for development studies could usefully enhance transparency about what development studies is and what it has to offer. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-308
Number of pages6
JournalPublic Administration and Development
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

transparency
learning
egg
business administration
efficiency
management
programme

Cite this

Learning to suck eggs, or is there a case for a postgraduate development studies benchmark? / Copestake, J.

In: Public Administration and Development, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2002, p. 303-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ce5660081c874b5790d1aa5b0887dac7,
title = "Learning to suck eggs, or is there a case for a postgraduate development studies benchmark?",
abstract = "Many academic disciplines in the UK have recently introduced subject benchmarks that specify core or minimum content for particular degrees. The article suggests that efficiency, quality, and transparency arguments in favour of such benchmarks may be undermined by problems in specification, identification, and implementation. By contrasting the programme specification for the Master's in development studies at Bath (overspecified) with the benchmark for Master's in management and business administration (underspecified), it suggests that an intermediate benchmark for development studies could usefully enhance transparency about what development studies is and what it has to offer. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.",
author = "J Copestake",
note = "ID number: ISI:000178960300002",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1002/pad.237",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "303--308",
journal = "Public Administration and Development",
issn = "0271-2075",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning to suck eggs, or is there a case for a postgraduate development studies benchmark?

AU - Copestake, J

N1 - ID number: ISI:000178960300002

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Many academic disciplines in the UK have recently introduced subject benchmarks that specify core or minimum content for particular degrees. The article suggests that efficiency, quality, and transparency arguments in favour of such benchmarks may be undermined by problems in specification, identification, and implementation. By contrasting the programme specification for the Master's in development studies at Bath (overspecified) with the benchmark for Master's in management and business administration (underspecified), it suggests that an intermediate benchmark for development studies could usefully enhance transparency about what development studies is and what it has to offer. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

AB - Many academic disciplines in the UK have recently introduced subject benchmarks that specify core or minimum content for particular degrees. The article suggests that efficiency, quality, and transparency arguments in favour of such benchmarks may be undermined by problems in specification, identification, and implementation. By contrasting the programme specification for the Master's in development studies at Bath (overspecified) with the benchmark for Master's in management and business administration (underspecified), it suggests that an intermediate benchmark for development studies could usefully enhance transparency about what development studies is and what it has to offer. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/pad.237

DO - 10.1002/pad.237

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 303

EP - 308

JO - Public Administration and Development

JF - Public Administration and Development

SN - 0271-2075

IS - 4

ER -