Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to examine differences in fear conditioning between anxious and nonanxious participants in a single large sample. Materials and methods: We employed a remote fear conditioning task (FLARe) to collect data from participants from the Twins Early Development Study (n = 1,146; 41% anxious vs. 59% nonanxious). Differences between groups were estimated for their expectancy of an aversive outcome towards a reinforced conditional stimulus (CS+) and an unreinforced conditional stimulus (CS−) during acquisition and extinction phases. Results: During acquisition, the anxious group (vs. nonanxious group) showed greater expectancy towards the CS−. During extinction, the anxious group (vs. nonanxious group) showed greater expectancy to both CSs. These comparisons yielded effect size estimates (d = 0.26–0.34) similar to those identified in previous meta-analyses. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that remote fear conditioning can be used to detect differences between groups of anxious and nonanxious individuals, which appear to be consistent with previous meta-analyses including in-person studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 719-730 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Depression and Anxiety |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 31 Jul 2021 |
Keywords
- anxiety disorders
- differential conditioning
- extinction
- remote study
- smartphones
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health