Key tensions in purposive action by middle managers leading change.

Jean E. Neumann, Kim Turnbull James, Russ Vince

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
106 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This research contributes to understanding emotional and political challenges experienced by middle managers as they work with contradictions inherent in leading change from the middle. Focus group data from 27 such middle managers based in the UK indicate that, once they have been assigned roles and tasks for leading change, underlying dynamics and processes influence the degree to which they become capable (or unable) to shape and navigate that change. A proposed conceptual framework, illustrated by a case vignette, provides a base of existing knowledge for understanding and explaining these dynamics. We also construct a model of the key tensions that are integral to middle managers leading change. A further contribution to practice involves elaborating the importance of collaborative effort across hierarchical and vertical boundaries, despite emotional and political tensions that undermine middle managers’ roles as change agents.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-142
Number of pages32
JournalResearch in Organizational Change and Development
Volume27
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Consultant managers
  • Emotion in organizations
  • Internal change
  • Leading change
  • Middle managers
  • Purposive action
  • Systems psychodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Key tensions in purposive action by middle managers leading change.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this