Justifying development financing of small NGOs: impact evidence, political expedience and the case of the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund

James Copestake, Anne-Marie O'Riordan, Myriam Telford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We review government funding of small NGOs as a mechanism to promote international development, taking the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund (CSCF) as a case study. Within a broad institutional economics perspective we contrast two possible justifications for such support - evidence of positive impact and political expedience. Qualitative research suggests that empirical evidence of the positive impact of NGO actions funded through CSCF was relatively weak. Political expedience helps to explain why this was tolerated. The failure to generate better impact evidence can also be attributed to lack of consensus about how to do so more rigorously, combined with a willingness to give small NGOs the benefit of the doubt in the absence of credible negative evidence of impact.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-170
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Development Effectiveness
Volume8
Issue number2
Early online date29 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

civil society
nongovernmental organization
non-governmental organization
evidence
institutional economics
qualitative research
funding
economics
financing
lack

Keywords

  • Challenge funds; civil society; development finance; impact evaluation; NGOs; warm glow

Cite this

Justifying development financing of small NGOs: impact evidence, political expedience and the case of the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund. / Copestake, James; O'Riordan, Anne-Marie; Telford, Myriam.

In: Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2016, p. 157-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae90080031a248748ca9bd8af9f4aecd,
title = "Justifying development financing of small NGOs: impact evidence, political expedience and the case of the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund",
abstract = "We review government funding of small NGOs as a mechanism to promote international development, taking the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund (CSCF) as a case study. Within a broad institutional economics perspective we contrast two possible justifications for such support - evidence of positive impact and political expedience. Qualitative research suggests that empirical evidence of the positive impact of NGO actions funded through CSCF was relatively weak. Political expedience helps to explain why this was tolerated. The failure to generate better impact evidence can also be attributed to lack of consensus about how to do so more rigorously, combined with a willingness to give small NGOs the benefit of the doubt in the absence of credible negative evidence of impact.",
keywords = "Challenge funds; civil society; development finance; impact evaluation; NGOs; warm glow",
author = "James Copestake and Anne-Marie O'Riordan and Myriam Telford",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/19439342.2016.1150317",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "157--170",
journal = "Journal of Development Effectiveness",
issn = "1943-9342",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justifying development financing of small NGOs: impact evidence, political expedience and the case of the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund

AU - Copestake, James

AU - O'Riordan, Anne-Marie

AU - Telford, Myriam

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We review government funding of small NGOs as a mechanism to promote international development, taking the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund (CSCF) as a case study. Within a broad institutional economics perspective we contrast two possible justifications for such support - evidence of positive impact and political expedience. Qualitative research suggests that empirical evidence of the positive impact of NGO actions funded through CSCF was relatively weak. Political expedience helps to explain why this was tolerated. The failure to generate better impact evidence can also be attributed to lack of consensus about how to do so more rigorously, combined with a willingness to give small NGOs the benefit of the doubt in the absence of credible negative evidence of impact.

AB - We review government funding of small NGOs as a mechanism to promote international development, taking the UK Civil Society Challenge Fund (CSCF) as a case study. Within a broad institutional economics perspective we contrast two possible justifications for such support - evidence of positive impact and political expedience. Qualitative research suggests that empirical evidence of the positive impact of NGO actions funded through CSCF was relatively weak. Political expedience helps to explain why this was tolerated. The failure to generate better impact evidence can also be attributed to lack of consensus about how to do so more rigorously, combined with a willingness to give small NGOs the benefit of the doubt in the absence of credible negative evidence of impact.

KW - Challenge funds; civil society; development finance; impact evaluation; NGOs; warm glow

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2016.1150317

U2 - 10.1080/19439342.2016.1150317

DO - 10.1080/19439342.2016.1150317

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 157

EP - 170

JO - Journal of Development Effectiveness

JF - Journal of Development Effectiveness

SN - 1943-9342

IS - 2

ER -