Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abstract

Unlike most other weapons, those which incorporate AI into their systems have the potential, and often the reality, of replacing the human decision maker in lethal contexts. Whereas the traditions of Just War contain within them distinct moral considerations which, in the context of war using conventional weapons, are for the guidance of the human user, when AI is introduced, this moral capacity cannot be taken for granted. Here, we discuss the necessity of introducing the moral character of the user into the design and use of AI-driven weapons, since neither the market in arms nor the tenets of utilitarian reasoning will ensure this. We go on to note the potential for AI to enable weapons systems to be more effective in defensive situations, especially where speed of calculation is key to successful defence, and to AI’s potential to enhance the Just War principles of proportionality and discrimination. However, because the boundary between defensive and offensive usages is permeable, we conclude that no AI application in combat can be regarded as ‘just another weapon’ and that the place of the human decision maker in, or on, the loop requires constant consideration.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJust War Theory and Artificial Intelligence
Subtitle of host publicationChallenges and Consequences
EditorsMaria Power, Maggi Savin-Baden
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherChapman and Hall/CRC
Chapter3
Pages29-40
Number of pages12
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781003440253
ISBN (Print)9781032576220
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Aug 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Computer Science
  • General Social Sciences
  • General Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Jus in Bello: AI is not just another weapon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this