TY - JOUR
T1 - Judgment in Business and Management Research
T2 - Shedding New Light on a Familiar Concept
AU - Tsoukas, Haridimos
AU - Hadjimichael, Demetris
AU - Nair, Anup
AU - Pyrko, Igor
AU - Wooley, Sarah
PY - 2024/7/1
Y1 - 2024/7/1
N2 - Judgment is an important concept in Business and Management Research, related to several subfields, ranging from staff appraisal and entrepreneurship to strategic decision making and business ethics. The popularity of the concept has given rise to a diversity of understandings, which, in some instances, lack theoretical precision or conceptual clarity. Our review offers a comprehensive overview and consolidates existing research on judgment in business and management research by identifying three perspectives: variance, prediction, wisdom. We show how these perspectives converge by highlighting shared characteristics of judgment, such as it being evaluative, personal and key to coping with uncertainty. In addition, our theoretical synthesis demonstrates how the three perspectives diverge along four central characteristics – theoretical inspiration, purpose, onto-epistemological orientation, and mode of reasoning – that shape how judgment is conceptualized and operationalized in business and management research. By developing a theoretical platform that configures judgment research into three distinct perspectives, our review opens up pathways for assessing the conceptual coherence and methodological implications of each perspective. Building on the latter, we explore how the three perspectives can complement each other and conclude by proposing future directions for the advancement of judgment research.
AB - Judgment is an important concept in Business and Management Research, related to several subfields, ranging from staff appraisal and entrepreneurship to strategic decision making and business ethics. The popularity of the concept has given rise to a diversity of understandings, which, in some instances, lack theoretical precision or conceptual clarity. Our review offers a comprehensive overview and consolidates existing research on judgment in business and management research by identifying three perspectives: variance, prediction, wisdom. We show how these perspectives converge by highlighting shared characteristics of judgment, such as it being evaluative, personal and key to coping with uncertainty. In addition, our theoretical synthesis demonstrates how the three perspectives diverge along four central characteristics – theoretical inspiration, purpose, onto-epistemological orientation, and mode of reasoning – that shape how judgment is conceptualized and operationalized in business and management research. By developing a theoretical platform that configures judgment research into three distinct perspectives, our review opens up pathways for assessing the conceptual coherence and methodological implications of each perspective. Building on the latter, we explore how the three perspectives can complement each other and conclude by proposing future directions for the advancement of judgment research.
KW - judgement
KW - cognition
KW - ethics
KW - decision making
KW - leadership
KW - organisation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85201717919
U2 - 10.5465/annals.2022.0175
DO - 10.5465/annals.2022.0175
M3 - Article
SN - 1941-6520
VL - 18
SP - 626
EP - 669
JO - Academy of Management Annals
JF - Academy of Management Annals
IS - 2
ER -