"It's crucial they're treated as patients": ethical guidance and empirical evidence regarding treating doctor-patients

Fiona E Fox, Gordon J Taylor, M F Harris, K J Rodham, J Sutton, Jennifer Scott, B Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

Ethical guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) about treating doctor–patients is compared and contrasted with evidence from a qualitative study of general practitioners (GPs) who have been patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs who had experienced a significant illness. Their experiences were discussed and issues about both being and treating doctor–patients were revealed. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to evaluate the data. In this article data extracts are used to illustrate and discuss three key points that summarise the BMA ethical guidance, in order to develop a picture of how far experiences map onto guidance. The data illustrate and extend the complexities of the issues outlined by the BMA document. In particular, differences between experienced GPs and those who have recently completed their training are identified. This analysis will be useful for medical professionals both when they themselves are unwell and when they treat doctor–patients. It will also inform recommendations for professionals who educate medical students or trainees.
LanguageEnglish
Pages7-11
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

medical association
general practitioner
General Practitioners
evidence
trainee
medical student
experience
illness
Medical Students
Interviews
interview
Empirical Evidence
Doctors
Guidance
British Medical Association

Cite this

"It's crucial they're treated as patients": ethical guidance and empirical evidence regarding treating doctor-patients. / Fox, Fiona E; Taylor, Gordon J; Harris, M F; Rodham, K J; Sutton, J; Scott, Jennifer; Robinson, B.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 7-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fox, Fiona E ; Taylor, Gordon J ; Harris, M F ; Rodham, K J ; Sutton, J ; Scott, Jennifer ; Robinson, B. / "It's crucial they're treated as patients": ethical guidance and empirical evidence regarding treating doctor-patients. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2010 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 7-11
@article{d3a5a9ec95ea406f994d9f2e4210c3f6,
title = "{"}It's crucial they're treated as patients{"}: ethical guidance and empirical evidence regarding treating doctor-patients",
abstract = "Ethical guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) about treating doctor–patients is compared and contrasted with evidence from a qualitative study of general practitioners (GPs) who have been patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs who had experienced a significant illness. Their experiences were discussed and issues about both being and treating doctor–patients were revealed. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to evaluate the data. In this article data extracts are used to illustrate and discuss three key points that summarise the BMA ethical guidance, in order to develop a picture of how far experiences map onto guidance. The data illustrate and extend the complexities of the issues outlined by the BMA document. In particular, differences between experienced GPs and those who have recently completed their training are identified. This analysis will be useful for medical professionals both when they themselves are unwell and when they treat doctor–patients. It will also inform recommendations for professionals who educate medical students or trainees.",
author = "Fox, {Fiona E} and Taylor, {Gordon J} and Harris, {M F} and Rodham, {K J} and J Sutton and Jennifer Scott and B Robinson",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jme.2008.029066",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "7--11",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "It's crucial they're treated as patients": ethical guidance and empirical evidence regarding treating doctor-patients

AU - Fox,Fiona E

AU - Taylor,Gordon J

AU - Harris,M F

AU - Rodham,K J

AU - Sutton,J

AU - Scott,Jennifer

AU - Robinson,B

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Ethical guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) about treating doctor–patients is compared and contrasted with evidence from a qualitative study of general practitioners (GPs) who have been patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs who had experienced a significant illness. Their experiences were discussed and issues about both being and treating doctor–patients were revealed. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to evaluate the data. In this article data extracts are used to illustrate and discuss three key points that summarise the BMA ethical guidance, in order to develop a picture of how far experiences map onto guidance. The data illustrate and extend the complexities of the issues outlined by the BMA document. In particular, differences between experienced GPs and those who have recently completed their training are identified. This analysis will be useful for medical professionals both when they themselves are unwell and when they treat doctor–patients. It will also inform recommendations for professionals who educate medical students or trainees.

AB - Ethical guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) about treating doctor–patients is compared and contrasted with evidence from a qualitative study of general practitioners (GPs) who have been patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs who had experienced a significant illness. Their experiences were discussed and issues about both being and treating doctor–patients were revealed. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to evaluate the data. In this article data extracts are used to illustrate and discuss three key points that summarise the BMA ethical guidance, in order to develop a picture of how far experiences map onto guidance. The data illustrate and extend the complexities of the issues outlined by the BMA document. In particular, differences between experienced GPs and those who have recently completed their training are identified. This analysis will be useful for medical professionals both when they themselves are unwell and when they treat doctor–patients. It will also inform recommendations for professionals who educate medical students or trainees.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951625482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.029066

U2 - 10.1136/jme.2008.029066

DO - 10.1136/jme.2008.029066

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 7

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

T2 - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 1

ER -