Abstract
This opinion piece is a reply to Katerina Gachevska’s article which questions some of the ideas andconcepts which I developed in a previous opinion piece entitled ‘Italian organised crime in the UK’ (Policing, vol 6, number 4, pp. 354–359). This opinion piece seeks to clarify and explain why ‘invisible’ criminal phenomena do not necessarily mean that they are not there. Perhaps, this strategy of ‘invisibility’ is a rational choice made by criminal groups in order to maximise their money-making opportunities without being detected?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 227- 232 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Policing |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 19 Mar 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Italian organized crime in the UK: continuing the debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS