Is There a Bias against Science in Lay-Conceptions of Creativity? A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Paul Hanel, Gregory Maio, Ana Karla Silva Soares, Antony S. R. Manstead

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate lay conceptions of creativity towards science as compared to art. In three studies across Brazil and the UK, we investigated whether science is less strongly associated with creativity compared to art. In Study 1, we found that art is more spontaneously associated with creativity among British but not Brazilian participants. Science and scientists were not spontaneously associated with creativity. In Study 2, art professions were perceived to be more creative compared to professions from the everyday life and science domains, and this effect was stronger in the British than Brazilian sample. However, when actual objects were displayed, this effect reversed in both countries (Study 3). Objects related to engineering – but not mathematics – were perceived as more creative compared to art related objects. Implications for the study of stereotypes about scientists and the emerging study of cross-cultural creativity are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPsyArXiv Preprints
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

intercultural comparison
creativity
art
trend
science
profession
art studies
everyday life
stereotype
Brazil
mathematics
engineering

Cite this

Is There a Bias against Science in Lay-Conceptions of Creativity? A Cross-Cultural Comparison. / Hanel, Paul; Maio, Gregory; Silva Soares, Ana Karla; Manstead, Antony S. R.

PsyArXiv Preprints, 2018.

Research output: Working paper

Hanel, Paul ; Maio, Gregory ; Silva Soares, Ana Karla ; Manstead, Antony S. R. / Is There a Bias against Science in Lay-Conceptions of Creativity? A Cross-Cultural Comparison. PsyArXiv Preprints, 2018.
@techreport{0931835c47ab426e88a490904071fa05,
title = "Is There a Bias against Science in Lay-Conceptions of Creativity? A Cross-Cultural Comparison",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate lay conceptions of creativity towards science as compared to art. In three studies across Brazil and the UK, we investigated whether science is less strongly associated with creativity compared to art. In Study 1, we found that art is more spontaneously associated with creativity among British but not Brazilian participants. Science and scientists were not spontaneously associated with creativity. In Study 2, art professions were perceived to be more creative compared to professions from the everyday life and science domains, and this effect was stronger in the British than Brazilian sample. However, when actual objects were displayed, this effect reversed in both countries (Study 3). Objects related to engineering – but not mathematics – were perceived as more creative compared to art related objects. Implications for the study of stereotypes about scientists and the emerging study of cross-cultural creativity are discussed.",
author = "Paul Hanel and Gregory Maio and {Silva Soares}, {Ana Karla} and Manstead, {Antony S. R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "27",
language = "English",
publisher = "PsyArXiv Preprints",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "PsyArXiv Preprints",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Is There a Bias against Science in Lay-Conceptions of Creativity? A Cross-Cultural Comparison

AU - Hanel, Paul

AU - Maio, Gregory

AU - Silva Soares, Ana Karla

AU - Manstead, Antony S. R.

PY - 2018/7/27

Y1 - 2018/7/27

N2 - In this paper, we investigate lay conceptions of creativity towards science as compared to art. In three studies across Brazil and the UK, we investigated whether science is less strongly associated with creativity compared to art. In Study 1, we found that art is more spontaneously associated with creativity among British but not Brazilian participants. Science and scientists were not spontaneously associated with creativity. In Study 2, art professions were perceived to be more creative compared to professions from the everyday life and science domains, and this effect was stronger in the British than Brazilian sample. However, when actual objects were displayed, this effect reversed in both countries (Study 3). Objects related to engineering – but not mathematics – were perceived as more creative compared to art related objects. Implications for the study of stereotypes about scientists and the emerging study of cross-cultural creativity are discussed.

AB - In this paper, we investigate lay conceptions of creativity towards science as compared to art. In three studies across Brazil and the UK, we investigated whether science is less strongly associated with creativity compared to art. In Study 1, we found that art is more spontaneously associated with creativity among British but not Brazilian participants. Science and scientists were not spontaneously associated with creativity. In Study 2, art professions were perceived to be more creative compared to professions from the everyday life and science domains, and this effect was stronger in the British than Brazilian sample. However, when actual objects were displayed, this effect reversed in both countries (Study 3). Objects related to engineering – but not mathematics – were perceived as more creative compared to art related objects. Implications for the study of stereotypes about scientists and the emerging study of cross-cultural creativity are discussed.

M3 - Working paper

BT - Is There a Bias against Science in Lay-Conceptions of Creativity? A Cross-Cultural Comparison

PB - PsyArXiv Preprints

ER -