TY - JOUR
T1 - Is Sustainability Rating Material to the Market?
AU - Claire Economidou
AU - Gounopoulos, Dimitrios
AU - Dimitrios Konstantios
AU - Emmanuel Tsiritakis
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the Editor (Rajkamal Iyer) and an anonymous referee for their detailed and insightful comments. We also thank Seraina Anagnostopoulou, Angelos Atzoulatos, Thomas Chemmanur, Si Cheng, Shaun Fitzgibbons, Reynolds Holdings Abraham Lioui, Nikos Paltalidis, Dimitrios Papanikolaou (the Editor of Journal of Financial Economics), Lase Heje Pederson, Lukasz Pomorski, and George Serapheim; seminar participants from the University of Birmingham, University of Cardiff, University of Piraeus, and University of York; and conference participants at the Financial Management Association (FMA) for their helpful comments. We also thank the CLS Blue Sky Blog of the University of Columbia and the FinReg Blog of Duke University for valuable feedback.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - This study examines whether information about a firm's engagement in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices is material to market participants. Evidence from a sample of 1856 initial public offerings (IPOs) by U.S. companies for the 2007–2018 period robustly documents that firms for which there is available ESG performance information prior to going public exhibit higher underpricing due to a positive market response. Such a reaction is validated by agency cost-reducing practices that ESG-rated firms follow prior to the IPO, the superior post-IPO market performance they exhibit in terms of equity financing, and the higher share of financially sophisticated investors they attract compared to their ESG-unrated peers. Overall, our results highlight that it pays off to do good and to have the right investors; however, firms’ good ESG practices need to be visible to the market, through rating practices, to reap the benefits.
AB - This study examines whether information about a firm's engagement in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices is material to market participants. Evidence from a sample of 1856 initial public offerings (IPOs) by U.S. companies for the 2007–2018 period robustly documents that firms for which there is available ESG performance information prior to going public exhibit higher underpricing due to a positive market response. Such a reaction is validated by agency cost-reducing practices that ESG-rated firms follow prior to the IPO, the superior post-IPO market performance they exhibit in terms of equity financing, and the higher share of financially sophisticated investors they attract compared to their ESG-unrated peers. Overall, our results highlight that it pays off to do good and to have the right investors; however, firms’ good ESG practices need to be visible to the market, through rating practices, to reap the benefits.
KW - environmental social governance (ESG)
KW - firm valuation
KW - initial public offering (IPO)
KW - market performance
KW - sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135621534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/fima.12406
DO - 10.1111/fima.12406
M3 - Article
SN - 0046-3892
VL - 52
SP - 127
EP - 179
JO - Financial Management
JF - Financial Management
IS - 1
ER -